Penguatan Sistem Monitoring Realisasi Transaksi Hasil Trade Expo Indonesia melalui Optimalisasi Peran Perwakilan Perdagangan Republik Indonesia di Luar Negeri

Authors

  • Muhammad Ikbal Sekretariat Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional, Kementerian Perdagangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v7i2.2861

Keywords:

Trade Expo Indonesia, transaction monitoring, trade promotion, Problem Tree Analysis, USG

Abstract

Trade Expo Indonesia (TEI) is Indonesia's flagship international trade promotion event aimed at expanding export markets through international trade exhibitions. To date, the success of TEI has primarily been measured by the potential transaction value generated during the exhibition, while realized post-event transactions have not been systematically documented. As a result, the effectiveness of trade promotion programs cannot be comprehensively evaluated, limiting evidence-based policymaking. This study aims to analyze the root causes of weaknesses in monitoring realized transactions from TEI and formulate policy recommendations to strengthen the monitoring system. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach using document analysis of laws and regulations, Trade Expo Indonesia reports from 2020–2025, Ministry of Trade documents, and Indonesian trade statistics. The analysis utilized Problem Tree Analysis to identify causal relationships among policy issues and the Urgency, Seriousness, Growth (USG) framework to prioritize the problems requiring immediate policy intervention.The findings reveal that the main issue is the suboptimal monitoring system for realized transactions, which is associated with inadequate regulations, the underutilized role of Indonesian Trade Representatives abroad, and the absence of an integrated monitoring information system. The study recommends revising Minister of Trade Regulation Number 13 of 2021 concerning Indonesian Trade Representatives Abroad, designating Indonesian Trade Representatives as the focal point for transaction monitoring, and developing an integrated Digital Trade Promotion Monitoring System (DTPMS). These policy measures are expected to improve the effectiveness of transaction monitoring, strengthen accountability in trade promotion programs, and support evidence-based trade policymaking.

 

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Indonesia 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Statistik perdagangan luar negeri Indonesia 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge.

Freixanet, J., Braojos, J., Rialp-Criado, A., & Rialp-Criado, J. (2022). Does international trade promotion work? A meta-analysis of export promotion programs. International Business Review, 31(2), Article 101987.

Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more evidence-informed policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 13 Tahun 2021 tentang Perwakilan Perdagangan di Luar Negeri. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 23 Tahun 2023 tentang Kebijakan dan Pengaturan Ekspor. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Laporan kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional Tahun 2024. Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Trade Expo Indonesia Virtual Exhibition 2020: Official report. Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Trade Expo Indonesia Digital Edition 2021: Official report. Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Trade Expo Indonesia 2022: Official report. Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Trade Expo Indonesia 2023: Official report. Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Trade Expo Indonesia 2024: Official report. Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2025). Trade Expo Indonesia 2025: Official report. Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Ekspor Nasional.

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank.

Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M., & Payton, L. (2010). Export promotion agencies revisited. Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 257–265.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Publishing.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Bidang Perdagangan.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.

Volpe Martincus, C., & Carballo, J. (2008). Is export promotion effective in developing countries? Firm-level evidence on the intensive and extensive margins of exports. Journal of International Economics, 76(1), 89–106.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Ikbal, M. (2026). Penguatan Sistem Monitoring Realisasi Transaksi Hasil Trade Expo Indonesia melalui Optimalisasi Peran Perwakilan Perdagangan Republik Indonesia di Luar Negeri. JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 7(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v7i2.2861

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.