Analisis Yuridis Tentang Unsur – Unsur Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) yang Dilakukan oleh Jaksa dalam Praktik Peradilan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v7i1.2219Keywords:
Money Laundering, Prosecutors, Legal Analysis, normative juridical, ProveAbstract
The criminal justice system in Indonesia is very concerned about money laundering crimes that continue to grow along with technological advances and the complexity of modern economic crimes. This study examines in depth the legal provisions related to TPPU in Indonesia, which is based on Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes. This research aims to identify the role of prosecutors as law enforcers in applying elements of anti-trafficking at the investigation and prosecution stages, as well as to analyze various obstacles that arise in the evidentiary process in court. Using a normative juridical approach, this study utilizes literature analysis, court decision review, and evaluation of relevant legal provisions. The findings of the study show that proving preliminary crimes and the flow of funds from crimes requires public prosecutors to have a comprehensive understanding of money laundering mechanisms, including the placement, layering, and integration stages. In practice, prosecutors face various challenges, such as difficulties in tracing the origins of assets disguised through complex transactions, limited access to financial technology data, and lack of cooperation support between law enforcement and financial institutions. These obstacles often cause the proving process to be protracted and less effective. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the capacity of law enforcement officials, strengthen coordination between agencies, and use more optimal technology to support efforts to eradicate trafficking more effectively and comprehensively.
References
Ahmadi, A., Irawan, B., & Herli, D. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap putusan hakim ne bis in idem dalam perkara tindak pidana pencucian uang dengan predicate crime korupsi. Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.51825/yta.v4i1.21761
Al Hafiz, M. (2023). Analisa ratio decidendi putusan pengadilan pada penggabungan perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang: Studi Putusan No: 16/Pid. Sus/Tpk/2015/Pn. Jkt. Pst dan No: 38/Pid. Sus/Tpk/2020/Pn. Jkt. Pst. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 608–623.
Anugerah, F., Rato, D., & Setyawan, F. (2024). Analisis pembuktian pidana asal dalam kasus tindak pidana pencucian uang yang diatur dalam undang-undang: Tinjauan terhadap prinsip hukum dan implementasi dalam praktik hukum di Indonesia. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(2), 1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i2.6507
Athallah, Z. S. (2025). Analisis yuridis putusan lepas yang dijatuhkan oleh majelis hakim dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang dilihat dari aspek tujuan pemidanaan (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 170/Pid. Sus/2021/Pn. Tbk) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Nasional).
Fajaryanto, A. S., Borman, M. S., Marwiyah, S., & Soekorini, N. (2025). Sistem pembuktian terbalik dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5(2), 1145–1156.
Fithroh, M., Anfal, S., & Mulyani, I. T. (2025). Analisis yuridis dan strategi penanggulangan tindak pidana pencucian uang di Indonesia dalam perspektif hukum pidana khusus. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 3(2), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1157
Gemilang, G., Ismaidar, I., & Zarzani, T. R. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2), 8455–8471.
Kumakauw, E. K., Bawole, H. Y. A., & Kasenda, V. D. (2025). Penggabungan penyidikan kasus tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 70/Pid. Sus-Tpk/2024/Pn. Jkt. Pst.). Lex Privatum, 16(1).
Musa, Y., Thalib, H., & Khalid, H. (2022). Kejaksaan sebagai penegak hukum dalam penyidikan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 3(4), 772–787.
Musrial, M. (2022). Penerapan unsur tindak pidana pencucian uang terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkotika. UNES Law Review, 5(1), 203–210.
Ramadhan, M. I. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis tentang putusan tindak pidana pencucian uang (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri No: 596/Pid. Sus/2018/PN/Mjk/20220418). Dinamika, 29(1), 7556–7566.
Silalahi, R. B. (2025). Penerapan delik pidana pencucian uang dalam kasus narkotika. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 4(1), 15–29.
Siregar, E. F., Helvis, H., & Markoni, M. (2021). Analisa yuridis eksekusi sita jaminan terhadap tindak pidana pencucian uang (TPPU) First Travel. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 2(11), 1560–1573. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v2i11.454
Waruwu, E. P. K. (2020). Analisis yuridis terhadap sistem pembuktian tindak pidana pencucian uang yang predicate crime tidak diketahui oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Studi Kasus: Perkara No. 537/K/PIDSUS/2014) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Riau).
Wati, A. F. (2024). Analisa putusan hakim dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang (Studi Putusan Nomor 730/Pid. Sus/2022/PN Bdg) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





