Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Kekuatan Hukum Sertifikat Hak Milik Tidak Mengikat di Pengadilan Negeri Kupang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v6i2.1971Keywords:
Judge's Consideration, Decision, Legal Force, Certificate of Ownership, Kupang District CourtAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the judge's considerations in issuing a decision stating that the certificate of ownership does not have binding legal force and the legal consequences of the decision stating that the certificate of ownership does not have binding legal force based on the initial survey conducted by the researcher, it was found that the lawsuit was filed after 5 years had passed. This study uses normative legal research with a case study (case approach). Data collection uses literature studies. Data collection and processing procedures are carried out using qualitative legal analysis. The results of the study indicate that the requirements for a certificate of ownership that does not have legal force that are often violated are the lack of good faith in obtaining the land. Meanwhile, violations of the requirements for land that is not directly or indirectly controlled by the owner, although related to other requirements, do not mean that the Certificate of Ownership has strong legal force. This is because of the requirements of Article 32 paragraph 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning land registration. There are several legal consequences. These legal consequences can be divided into two types, namely legal consequences that apply retroactively or backward and legal consequences that apply forward. As well as the legal consequences and in substance, these legal consequences are in line with the form of achievement in contract law as regulated in Article 1234 of the Civil Code.
References
Afandi, A. (2004). Hukum waris-hukum keluarga-hukum pembuktian. Rineka Cipta.
Anggraeni, E. (n.d.). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata di Indonesia. Saraswati Nitisara.
Ekasari, L. P. H. (2019). Kekuatan putusan pengadilan tata usaha negara yang berkekuatan hukum tetap terhadap pembatalan sertifikat hak milik atas tanah melalui kewenangan kepala kantor pertanahan. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, 6(1), 22–35.
Hulu, K. I. (2021). Kekuatan alat bukti sertifikat hak milik atas tanah dalam bukti kepemilikan hak. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 1(1), 27–31.
Jaya, I. G. P., Utama, A., Made, I., & Westra, I. K. (2017). Kekuatan hukum sertifikat hak tanggungan dalam hal musnahnya obyek hak tanggungan karena bencana alam (Tesis doktoral, Universitas Udayana).
Kartasapoetra, G., dkk. (1985). Hukum tanah jaminan UUPA bagi keberhasilan pendayagunaan tanah. Bina Aksara.
Kementerian Agama RI. (n.d.). BAB III. Diambil dari https://etheses.iainkediri.ac.id/5107/3/931111018_Bab3.pdf
Mahkamah Agung RI. (n.d.). Profil Pengadilan Negeri Kupang. Diambil dari https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/pengadilan/profil/pengadilan/pn-kupang.html
Prasetyawati, S. E., Ramadan, S., & Aprillia, R. D. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum dalam penerbitan sertifikat hak milik (SHM) atas bidang tanah sebagai objek sengketa yang tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat secara sepihak (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Kla). Journal Presumption of Law, 6(2), 203–221.
Safitri, F. A., dkk. (2020). Akibat hukum penggunaan sistem publikasi negatif berunsur positif dalam pendaftaran tanah di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Undip, 13(2), 791.
Santoso, M. (2024). Legalitas dan legitimasi surat keterangan tanah. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Santoso, U. (2010). Pendaftaran dan peralihan hak atas tanah. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Santoso, U. (2012). Hukum agraria: Kajian komprehensif. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sutedi, A. (2006). Pengakuan hak milik atas tanah menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Cipta Jaya.
Taira, A. S. W. (2016). Kekuatan hukum sertifikat hak milik atas tanah yang dibuat berdasarkan putusan pengadilan. Kerta Dyatmika, 13(1).
Tunggu, R. (2023). Implikasi yuridis dianutnya causal stelsel terhadap kekuatan mengikat sertifikat tanah objek hak tanggungan. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 7546–7557.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
