Analisis Putusan Hakim terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana yang Mengendarai Kendaraan Bermotor karena Kelalaiannya Mengakibatkan Orang Lain Meninggal Dunia di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Bajawa
Putusan Nomor 52/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Bjw
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v6i1.2137Keywords:
Trial Facts, Application of Penalty, Actions of the Defendant, Motor Vehicles, Negligence, Judge's DecisionAbstract
This research aims to analyze the considerations of the Judge inimposing a prison sentence of 9 (nine) months on the Defendant who, due to their negligence in driving a motor vehicle, caused the death of another person, which has corresponded with the actions of the defendant and the facts presented in the trial. The type of research that the author uses is Normative Juridical research (library research), which is research that studies document analysis using various secondary data such as legislation, court decisions, legal theories, and can include the opinions of scholars. This research shows that (1) The judge in imposing a prison sentence of 9 (nine) months on the defendant did not consider the actions of the defendant sufficiently, so the application of the prison sentence of 9 (nine) months was not appropriate considering the actions of the defendant, which were that the defendant saw the victim from a distance of 50 (fifty) meters, but the defendant did not attempt to stop his vehicle, merely trying to change lanes, and the victim also moved to the same lane, making the accident unavoidable. (2) The judge's decision to impose a prison sentence of 9 (nine) months on the defendant was in accordance with the facts presented during the trial which included the Defendant's Testimony, the Indictment by the Public Prosecutor, and the Demands of the Public Prosecutor.
References
Ali, C., & Rubini. (1974). Pengantar hukum acara perdata. Bandung: Alumni.
Andi, H. (2011). Hukum acara pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Andi, H. (2017). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Hukum acara perdata. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Barda, A. N. (1984). Sari kuliah hukum pidana II. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Undip.
Gilson, E. (1956). The Christian philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Random House.
Juniati, R. J. (2023). Analisis putusan hakim terhadap tindak pidana kelalaian berkendara yang mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa berdasarkan asas keadilan dan perlindungan anak (Studi Putusan Nomor: 71/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Skm). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 2(4), Agustus.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Leden, M. (2012). Asas teori praktik hukum pidana (Cet. ke-7). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Masruchin, R., dkk. (2011). Buku ajar hukum pidana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2006). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia (Edisi ke-7). Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Mertokusumo, S. (2013). Pengantar hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Mezger, in Muladi & Priyatno, D. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Moeljatno. (1983). Azas-azas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Moeljatno. (2008). Hukum pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Pasal 60 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Poernomo, B. (1981). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Prasetyo, T. (2011). Hukum pidana I (Cet. ke-2). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
R. Subekti. (1985). Hukum acara perdata. Jakarta: Penerbitan Universitas Indonesia.
Tofik Yanuar, C. (2022). Hukum pidana. Jakarta.
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Wahyuni, F. (2017). Hukum pidana. Jakarta: Penerbitan Universitas Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
