Efektivitas Digitalisasi Pendaftaran Tanah pada Kantor Pertanahan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v7i1.2213Keywords:
Digitalization, Effectiveness, Land Office, Land Registration, Public ServiceAbstract
The development of digital technology has encouraged the government to modernize public services, including in the field of land affairs. Traditionally, land registration has been associated with long, complex procedures that are often prone to abuse of authority. To address these challenges, the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) has begun implementing a digital-based land registration system. However, its implementation raises an important question: is this digital system truly effective in improving the quality of services at the Land Office, or does it instead create new obstacles? This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of land registration digitalization, particularly in terms of accessibility, efficiency, transparency, and the challenges encountered during its implementation. The research employs an empirical juridical method with qualitative analysis. The juridical approach is used to examine the legal foundations of land registration digitalization, including Law No. 5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles, Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration, and the Ministerial Regulation of ATR/BPN No. 1 of 2021 on Electronic Certificates. The empirical approach involves direct observation of service processes at the Land Office and interviews with employees and citizens utilizing digital services. The findings reveal that digitalization of land registration has generally improved the quality of services at the Land Office. Administrative processes have become faster, land data are stored more securely, and service transparency has increased, as the public can monitor the status of their registration online.
References
Council of Europe. (2001). Budapest convention on cybercrime. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Dewi, R. A. R. M. (2024). Penggunaan sertifikat elektronik untuk meningkatkan keamanan hak atas tanah. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i9.1441
Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ibrahim, J. (2020). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
Indrajit, R. E. (2004). E-Government: Strategi pembangunan dan pengembangan sistem pelayanan publik berbasis teknologi digital. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2021). Peraturan Menteri ATR/BPN Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Sertipikat Elektronik. Jakarta: Kementerian ATR/BPN.
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2017). Pedoman umum penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik. Jakarta.
Manurung, K. (2024). Pendaftaran tanah secara elektronik pada kantor pertanahan. Berajah: Jurnal Daerah (OJS).
Moeljatno. (2021). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nafisah, R. (2022). Keabsahan hukum sertifikat elektronik dalam kepemilikan tanah berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri ATR/BPN Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Sertifikat Elektronik. Dinamika Hukum. Universitas Islam Malang.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Republik Indonesia. (1960). Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
Republik Indonesia. (1997). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE). Jakarta: DPR & Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah, Satuan Rumah Susun, dan Pendaftaran Tanah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2021 Nomor 28.
Rizky, M., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). Penegakan hukum terhadap pencucian uang berbasis aset digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(3).
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Rukin, S. P. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.
Sapardiyono, & Sukmo Pinuji. (2022). Konsistensi perlindungan hukum kepemilikan dan hak atas tanah melalui sertipikat tanah elektronik. Widya Bhumi, 2(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.31292/wb.v2i1.19
Sari, D. P., & Widodo, A. (2023). Optimalisasi pelayanan publik melalui digitalisasi pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Agraria, 13(1), 55–70.
Setiawan, D. (2020). Kejahatan siber dan penegakan hukumnya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Siagian, S. P. (2001). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sihombing, N. K., & Marbun, L. (2023). Penerapan digital forensics dalam pengungkapan tindak pidana pencucian uang di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 30(1).
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsil. (2021). Kriminalitas digital dan penegakan hukum pidana ekonomi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development: A UNDP policy document. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Yusuf, A. M. R., Kurniati, N., & Rukmana, Y. Y. (2024). Pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah secara elektronik. Acta Hukum – Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
