Penerapan Exceptio Non Adimpleti Contractus pada Kontrak Konstruksi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2982Keywords:
bank guarantee, breach of contract, construction contract, exceptio non adimpleti contractus, Consumer Legal ProtectionAbstract
This study examines the applicability of the exceptio non adimpleti contractus principle to the calling of bank guarantees in construction contracts. It employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials include legislation, court decisions, legal doctrines, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings demonstrate that, normatively, the calling of a bank guarantee cannot be challenged solely on the basis of exceptio non adimpleti contractus because a bank guarantee is independent of the underlying construction contract and is generally unconditional. Consequently, the issuing bank is obliged to honor a claim once the formal requirements stipulated in the guarantee have been fulfilled, without first examining whether a breach has occurred in the underlying contract. Nevertheless, judicial intervention may be justified when the beneficiary acts in bad faith, improperly exercises its rights, or submits a claim while the alleged breach remains legally disputed. Therefore, although the principle cannot directly prevent the calling of a bank guarantee, it remains relevant as a legal protection mechanism for parties acting in good faith and as a means of upholding reciprocity, fairness, and legal certainty in construction contracts.
References
Alshammari, S., Al-Gahtani, K., Alhammad, I., & Braimah, N. (2017). A systematic method to analyze force majeure in construction claims. Buildings, 7(4), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7040115
Anysz, H., Apollo, M., & Grzyl, B. (2021). Quantitative risk assessment in construction disputes based on machine learning tools. Symmetry, 13(5), 744. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050744
Bey, E. F. (2013). Jaminan gadai deposito dalam perjanjian bank garansi di PT Bank Victoria Syariah Jakarta. Notarius, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v4i1.5890
Brilianto, H. F., & Marpaung, D. S. H. (2022). Exceptio non adimpleti contractus pada kasus wanprestasi dalam perjanjian jual beli. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3476
Cakmak, E., & Cakmak, P. I. (2014). An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical network process. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.441
Chaphalkar, N. B., Iyer, K. C., & Patil, S. K. (2015). Prediction of outcome of construction dispute claims using multilayer perceptron neural network model. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1827–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.002
Fanani, M., Nugraha, S. N., & Muaziz, M. H. (2025). Penerapan prinsip exceptio non adimpleti contractus dalam perkara wanprestasi pada perjanjian lisan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 933–943. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i2.7389
Grzyl, B., Apollo, M., & Kristowski, A. (2019). Application of game theory to conflict management in a construction contract. Sustainability, 11(7), 1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071983
Gurgun, A. P., & Koc, K. (2023). The role of contract incompleteness factors in project disputes: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), 3895–3926. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2021-1020
Harmon, K. M. J. (2003). Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3(4), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)
Hassan, A. A., & Adnan, H. (2018). The problems and abuse of performance bond in the construction industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 117, 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/117/1/012044
Ilma, D. A. U., Fitriyanti, F., & Ma’arif, F. (2020). State of the art perselisihan kontrak konstruksi di Indonesia. INERSIA: Informasi dan Ekspose Hasil Riset Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur, 16(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v16i2.36901
Lee, J., Ham, Y., & Yi, J.-S. (2021). Construction disputes and associated contractual knowledge discovery using unstructured text-heavy data: Legal cases in the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 13(16), 9403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169403
Mitkus, S., & Mitkus, T. (2014). Causes of conflicts in a construction industry: A communicational approach. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.922
Ndekugri, I. (1999). Performance bonds and guarantees: Construction owners and professionals beware. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(6), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:6(428)
Nevianti, N. D., Marniati, F. S., & Ismail, I. (2024). Kepastian hukum kontrak kerja konstruksi terkait wanprestasi penyedia jasa dalam menyerahkan bangunan tidak tepat waktu kepada pengguna jasa. Cendekia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 1(9), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.62335/e4vfzj85
Oke, A. E., & Ogunsemi, D. R. (2016). Structural equation modelling of construction bond administration. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(3), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-02-2016-0008
Pratama, R. A., Kasahdi, & Badriyah, S. M. (2016). Tinjauan yuridis garansi pelaksanaan tidak bersyarat (unconditional performance bond) sebagai bentuk jaminan dalam kontrak konstruksi. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12071
Saputra, C. D., & Surahmia, M. (2022). Tanggung jawab para pihak dalam kontrak kerja konstruksi menurut Undang-Undang tentang Jasa Konstruksi. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(2), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i2.2470
Senaratne, S., & Farhan, S. (2023). Role of standard contracts in mitigating disputes in construction. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15(1), 04522045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000593
Suardika, I. K., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2021). Tanggung jawab perdata pemborong akibat kegagalan bangunan dalam perspektif hukum positif Indonesia. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(3), 456–462. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.3.3649.456-462
Supardi, A., Adnan, H., & Yaakob, J. (2009). Legal analysis on Malaysian construction contract: Conditional versus unconditional performance bond. Journal of Politics and Law, 2(3), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v2n3p25
Triastiti, I. G. Y. (2022). Implementasi bank garansi dalam kontrak konstruksi antara pemerintah dan kontraktor di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kota Bengkulu. Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v7i1.12486
Xiouri, M. (2019). The exceptio non adimpleti contractus in public international law. International Community Law Review, 21(1), 56–92. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341390
Zelenovskaya, T., Matorina, V., & Fomenko, A. (2023). Non adimpleti contractus and a problem of overinclusiveness in international law. HSE University Journal of International Law, 1(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.17323/jil.2023.17443
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
