Peningkatan Literasi Perbankan Syariah Santri melalui Workshop Praktis Fiqh  Muamalah di Pondok Pesantren Latansa Darussalam Palembang

Choiriyah Choiriyah; Dwi Noviani; Dwinda Fatimah Ishaq; Jordy Hairul Rafli

doi:10.55606/jppmi.v5i2.2407

Authors

Choiriyah Choiriyah Sekolah Tinggi Ekonomi dan Bisnis Syariah (STEBIS) Indo Global
Dwi Noviani UQI Inderalaya Ogan Ilir Palembang
Dwinda Fatimah Ishaq STEBIS Indo Global Mandiri Palembang
Jordy Hairul Rafli STEBIS Indo Global Mandiri Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jppmi.v5i2.2407

Keywords:

experiential learning, fiqh muamalah, Islamic literacy, pesantren, workshop.

Abstract

This community service activity aimed to improve students’ Islamic banking literacy through an experiential learning approach based on a fiqh muamalah workshop at Latansa Darussalam Islamic Boarding School, Palembang. The activity involved 100 participants consisting of students and teachers as an effort to strengthen understanding of Islamic economic and banking principles. The methods used in the activity included lectures, discussions, question-and-answer sessions, and simulations of sharia transaction practices, enabling participants not only to gain theoretical understanding but also practical experience in implementing sharia concepts. The evaluation was conducted using pre-test and post-test instruments in the form of multiple-choice questions and Likert scales to measure participants’ level of understanding before and after the activity. The evaluation results showed an increase in the participants’ average score from 55 to 82, with a gain score of 0.6, which falls into the moderate to high category. These findings indicate that an experience-based learning approach is effective in improving conceptual and practical understanding related to Islamic economics and is recommended for broader implementation in Islamic educational institutions.

References

Aba-Oli, Z., Koyas, K., & Husen, A. (2025). Higher-order thinking skills oriented problem-based learning interventions in mathematics: A systematic literature review. School Science and Mathematics, 125(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12640

Agustinova, D. E., Wulansari, N. L. T., & Fitriana, K. N. (2025). Improving the professional competence of high school teachers in Yogyakarta through the development of classroom action research management based on Android mobile applications. Journal of Science and Education, 5(2), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v5i2.442

Anwar, R. B., Rahmawati, D., & Wulandari, A. A. (2025). Trends in research on mathematical representation in mathematics learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(3), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3577

Budiarto, M. K., Karsidi, R., & Rahman, A. (2024). E-learning platforms to enhance 21st century skills for vocational students: A systematic literature review. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(5), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.5.3417

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ferencová, J., Pirohová, I., Šuťáková, V., & Miňová, M. (2024). Development of teacher professional competence through action research as a form of professional development. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 53, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2024.53.8

Fink, A. (2020). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscog.2019.1.4.57

Kamarudin, M. Z., & Mat Noor, M. S. A. (2024). What do we know about the selection of action research methodologies in primary science education? A systematic literature review. Educational Action Research, 32(5), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2254170

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report. Keele University and Durham University.

Kurniati, E., Suwono, H., Ibrohim, I., Suryadi, A., & Saefi, M. (2022). International scientific collaboration and research topics on STEM education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11842

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

Mehddi, F., Kazi, A. S., & Butt, A. I. (2025). From theory to practice: How STEAM professional development shapes teacher beliefs and perceptions about design thinking activities. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251355779

Ni, X., Nuryana, Z., Lu, S., & Xu, W. (2025). A systematic literature review of mathematics interactive games in elementary education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2358127

Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Panakaje, N., Rahiman, H. U., Parvin, S. R., P., S., K., M., Yatheen, & Irfana, S. (2024). Revolutionizing pedagogy: Navigating technology integration in higher education for teacher learning and performance enhancement. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2308430. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308430

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971