Dampak Asas Erga Omnes dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Studi tentang Batasan Legal Standing dalam Pengajuan Permohonan Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

  • Cornelia Angelica Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Simplexius Asa Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Rizal Thene Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v6i1.2127

Keywords:

Erga Omnes Principle, Decision, Limitation of Legal Standing, Submission of Application, Law, Constitutional Court

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's decision not only affects individuals or certain groups, but also has significant consequences for the public and the country as a whole. The Constitutional Court's decision provides legal certainty for society and the government by determining the implementation or cancellation of a policy that can help create a stable and predictable legal environment. This research is a normative research by studying and basing it on secondary data. Then analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the interests recognized by law in Indonesia regarding legal standing still revolve around proving real losses as a form of interest recognized by the Constitution. The principle of erga omnes has an important meaning in the Constitutional Court's decision. An appropriate alternative is needed to ensure that the decision that then has an impact on everyone does not result in new constitutional losses for parties who are not in dispute. the implementation of the Constitutional Court's decision still faces serious challenges, ranging from delays in implementation to ignoring the decision by related institution.

References

Arbie, A., dkk. (n.d.). Sifat final dan mengikat putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi berdasarkan asas erga omnes. Jurnal Abstrak. Diakses pada 25 Februari 2025, dari Jurnal+Ardiansyah+Arbie (1).pdf

Hamilton, A. (2003). The Federalist Papers (C. Rossiter, Ed.). Signet Classics.

Komnas HAM. (2018). Laporan tentang perlindungan hak penyandang disabilitas di Indonesia. Diakses pada 1 November 2024, dari https://komnasham.go.id

Maulidi, M. A. (n.d.). Menyoal kekuatan eksekutorial putusan final dan mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pusat Studi Hukum Konstitusi (PSHK), hlm. 346. Diakses pada 10 Maret 2025.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dan perilaku: Hidup baik adalah dasar hukum yang baik. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Republik Indonesia. (2006). Hukum acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (Amandemen ke-IV).

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076.

Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 70, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5226.

MetroTV News. (2017, 26 Januari). Putusan MK dianggap menghambat pemberantasan korupsi. Diakses pada 14 Februari 2025, dari http://news.metrotvnews.com/read/2017/01/26/648500/putusan-mk-dianggap

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

Cornelia Angelica, Simplexius Asa, & Rizal Thene. (2025). Dampak Asas Erga Omnes dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Studi tentang Batasan Legal Standing dalam Pengajuan Permohonan Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 6(1), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v6i1.2127

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.