The Role Of Family in Shaping Social Values in the Digital Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v6i2.1844Keywords:
Digital era, Family, Social valuesAbstract
This study explores the vital role of families in shaping social values among children and adolescents within the increasingly dominant digital environment. Digital technology has transformed communication patterns and modes of cultural transmission, presenting new challenges for families in instilling core values while navigating technological influences. Using a qualitative case study approach, this research involved 15 Indonesian families from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews, observations, and media diaries to understand the dynamics of value transmission in digital contexts.The findings reveal that family communication patterns—whether conversation-oriented, conformity-oriented, or laissez-faire—significantly influence children’s internalization of values. Effective strategies identified include parental digital co-learning, value-based guidance, and the promotion of critical media literacy. Major challenges include value conflicts between family teachings and digital culture, concerns over cultural preservation, and competition for children’s attention due to immersive technology.Nevertheless, the study also found that families can strategically leverage technology to reinforce values through careful media selection, engagement in meaningful digital activities, and fostering intergenerational connections. In conclusion, while families remain crucial socializing agents, the successful transmission of values requires thoughtful adaptation of traditional practices to meet the realities of the digital age.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Common Sense Media. (2020). The Common Sense Census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Common Sense Media.
Hendriyani, H., Hollander, E., d'Haenens, L., & Beentjes, J. W. (2014). Views on children's media use in Indonesia: Parents, children, and teachers. International Communication Gazette, 76(4–5), 322–339.
Jenkins, H., Shresthova, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Zimmerman, A. (2016). By any media necessary: The new youth activism. NYU Press.
Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi [Introduction to anthropology]. Rineka Cipta.
Kuczynski, L., & Parkin, C. M. (2007). Agency and bidirectionality in socialization: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialectics. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 259–283). Guilford Press.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2013). Children, internet and risk in comparative perspective. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 1–8.
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105.
Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
Turkle, S. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & de Leeuw, R. (2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 445–469.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.