Sebab Atau Alasan Hakim Tidak Menjatuhkan Hukuman Maksimal Serta Hambatan yang Dihadapi dalam Penanganan Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana di Jalur 40 Kupang Kota

Authors

  • Melani Yosefine Akunut Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Rudepel Petrus Leo Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Deddy R Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.711

Keywords:

Reasons for Sentencing, Maximum Sentence, Aggravated Murder, Impediments

Abstract

Premeditated murder is the crime of taking the life of another human being, or killing after planning the time or method, with the aim of ensuring the success of the killing or to avoid capture. Premeditated murder in general law is the most serious type of murder, and the perpetrator may be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes or reasons why the judge did not impose the maximum sentence and the obstacles faced in handling cases of premeditated murder in the Kupang City line This research is an empirical legal research, conducted at the Kupang District Court, Data collection techniques use observation techniques, interviews, and literature/document studies. The results of data management were analyzed descriptively qualitatively using the inductive method. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be seen: (1) The reason or reason the judge did not give the maximum sentence to the perpetrators of murder on Line 40 Kupang City there are two reasons, namely, the Judge considers the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the perpetrators. (2) The obstacles faced in handling premeditated murder cases are external and internal factors.

References

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2008, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti

Chazawi Adami. 2011. Kejahatan terhadap tubuh dan nyawa.Jakarta: Rajawali.

Delyana Sahnti, 2004, Konsep Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta Liberty.

H.A.K. Moch Anwar. 1989, Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus (KUHP buku II). Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti

Leden Marpaung. 2000. Tindak Pidana Terhadap Nyawa dan Tubuh, Pemberantasan Dan Prevensinya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Leden Marpaung. 2011. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Penyidikan dan Penyelidikan). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

M.Sudradjat Bassar. 2012. Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu Dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Remadja Karya

Muhammad.2006. Potret Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Rusli Muhammad.2007. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: Citra Aditya

Roeslan Saleh. 1981. Perbuatan dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Soerjono Soekanto. 2013. Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegak Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soesilo. R. 2013. Kitab Undang-undang Pidana (KUHP) Lengkap dengan komentarnya Pasal demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.

Stephan Hurwitz.1986. Kriminologi. Jakarta: Bina Aksara

Topo santoso., Eva Achani Zulfa. 2011. Kriminologi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo

Downloads

Published

2023-10-22

How to Cite

Melani Yosefine Akunut, Rudepel Petrus Leo, & Deddy R. (2023). Sebab Atau Alasan Hakim Tidak Menjatuhkan Hukuman Maksimal Serta Hambatan yang Dihadapi dalam Penanganan Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana di Jalur 40 Kupang Kota. Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 1(4), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.711

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.