Kewenangan Hakim dalam Menyatakan Gugatan idak Dapat di Terima Niet Ontvankelije Verklaard dalam Perkara Perdata (Putusan Nomor 82/Pdt.G/2025/Pn Kwg)

Edward Japanis Ratu Dewan; Sartika Dewi; Muhamad Abas

doi:10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2570

Authors

Edward Japanis Ratu Dewan Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
Sartika Dewi Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
Muhamad Abas Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2570

Keywords:

’Civil Procedural Law, Error in Persona, Examination of Lawsuits, Judicial Authority, Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard

Abstract

This research discusses the authority of judges in declaring a lawsuit inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard/NO) in civil cases based on Decision Number 82/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kwg. The issues examined in this study relate to the application of formal requirements of a lawsuit and the authority of judges in rendering an NO decision due to errors in determining legal subjects (error in persona). This study aims to analyze the application of civil procedural law regarding the formal requirements of a lawsuit and to examine the authority of judges in declaring a lawsuit inadmissible. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory and case approaches. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the formal requirements of a lawsuit hold a very important position in civil procedural law. Errors in determining legal subjects, particularly involving a party who has passed away without involving the heirs, result in a formally defective lawsuit and cause it to be declared inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard). In Decision Number 82/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kwg, the judges exercised their authority in accordance with civil procedural law to maintain legal certainty and orderly judicial proceedings. However, the application of such authority is considered to be overly formalistic because it did not provide an opportunity to amend the lawsuit, thereby giving less attention to substantive justice for the plaintiff.

Author Biographies

Sartika Dewi, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Dosen Ilmu Hukum

Muhamad Abas, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Dosen Ilmu Hukum

References

Abdul Manan. (2022). Hukum acara perdata. Kencana.

Abdul Manan. (2023). Hukum acara perdata. Kencana.

Dwi Putri Lestari. (2021). Peralihan hak dan kewajiban dalam hukum waris. Jurnal Hukum Perdata.

Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Pasal 118 (1941).

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata). (1838). Ketentuan mengenai subjek hukum dan kecakapan bertindak dalam hukum perdata.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Muhaimin. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram University Press.

Mukti Fajar, & Achmad, Y. (2022). Penelitian hukum. Pustaka Pelajar.

Asnawi, M. N. (2023). Teori dan praktik hukum acara perdata Indonesia. UII Press.

Harahap, M. Y. (2023). Hukum acara perdata. Sinar Grafika.

Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Pengantar hukum Indonesia. Kencana.

Nur Solikin. (2021). Access to justice dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia. Prenadamedia.

Pengadilan Negeri Karawang. (2025). Putusan Nomor 82/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kwg.

Wardani, R. P., Iftitah, A., Yuliastuti, E., Alfaris, M., & Widhiandono, E. (2024). Analisis yuridis putusan niet ontvankelijke verklaard pada akta jual beli. Risalah Hukum, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v20i1.1493

Sarwono. (2021). Asas-asas hukum acara perdata. Sinar Grafika.