Praktik Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Kediri

Authors

  • Firda Adita Nurul Ihsani Universitas Terbuka
  • Grahadi Purna Putra Univesitas Khairun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i4.1651

Keywords:

Settlement, Conflict, Land, Mediation

Abstract

In the current era, land is a basic need that is extremely important and meaningful in human life, particularly as a place to live, work, farm, or conduct various economic activities. With the rapidly growing population, the demand for residential land is also increasing. The population growth that is not matched by land availability creates significant pressure in the property market, leading to the development of new housing and settlements, both in urban and suburban areas. However, due to the increasingly limited availability of habitable land, this often triggers intense competition among individuals or parties with vested interests in obtaining land rights. The desire to own land has become very strong, as nowadays, land is not only used as a residence but also as a valuable resource. This often causes land disputes where the parties involved feel disadvantaged, either due to overlapping ownership, unclear land status claims, or differences in land use allocation. Due to the increasingly complex issues, the Land Office of Kediri City provides an alternative solution for boundary dispute resolution, namely mediation. This practice is an effort to resolve land conflicts peacefully and efficiently. Land disputes are becoming more complex and prolonged, often involving the government, businesses, and local residents. Moreover, land-related issues are frequently associated with unclear administration, weak law enforcement, or differing interpretations of existing regulations. As a result, not only does it impact the individuals involved, but it can also affect social and economic stability in a region. To address these issues, a more structured and transparent approach to land distribution and management is required. The government and society must work together to ensure fair and clear land distribution and provide wise solutions to disputes based on the principles of social justice. Mediation offers a more flexible approach compared to litigation by prioritizing dialogue among disputing parties. In this context, mediation helps alleviate tensions and create mutually beneficial solutions, enabling faster and more cost-effective processes. This study analyzes the effectiveness of mediation practices in reducing the number of disputes brought to court and assesses public perceptions of this resolution method. The results show that mediation can increase the satisfaction of the parties involved and promote stability in land ownership.

References

Aulia, R. (2017). Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Di bawah Kementerian Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/BPN. Jurnal HIMA HAM, 4(2).

Boedi Harsono. (2015). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hartana, & Darmika, P. (2022). Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Mediasi Sebagai Jalur Alternatif. 10(3), 327–336.

Juwita Tarochi Boboy, Budi Santoso, & Irawati. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi Berdasarkan Teori Dean G. Pruitt dan Jeffrey Z. Rubin. Notarius, 13(2).

Kurniati, N. (2016). "Mediasi-Arbitrase" Untuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah.

Kurniati, N., Madiong, B., & Makkawaru, Z. (2021). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Jalur Mediasi di Desa Bontomanai Kecamatan Mangarabombang Kabupaten Takalar. Jurnal Paradigma Administrasi Negara, 3(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.35965/jpan.v3i2.662

Kuswanto. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah dalam Kasus Tumpang Tindih Kepemilikan Atas Sebidang Tanah di Badan Pertanahan Nasional/ATR Kabupaten Kudus. Jurnal Akta, 4(1).

Paramartha, I. M. W. H., & Pemayun, C. I. A. (2018). Kekuatan Hukum Mediasi Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(3).

Prasetyo, P. K., et al. (2020). Praktik Kebijakan Program Strategis Nasional, Kendala Dan Peluang. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.

Romdoni, M., WN, S. F., & Nurdiansyah, R. (2022). Impact of Political Policy on the Implementation of Law Enforcement. Mediation: Journal of Law, 1(2), 67–74.

Saputro, B. (2022). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa/Konflik Pertanahan. Hermeneutika: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 165–176.

Septiani, D. A. P., & Edith, R. M. S. (2022). Perkembangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan di Luar Pengadilan Melalui Proses Mediasi. Jurnal Notarius, 15(1).

Septyaningrum, P. N. (2024). Rekonstruksi Upaya Perdamaian Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Gugatan Sederhana Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tjukup, I. K., Siki Layang, I. W. B., Martana, N. A., Markeling, I. K., Dananjaya, N. S., Arsha Putra, I. P. R., ... & Tribuana, P. A. R. (2016). Akta Notaris (Akta Otentik) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Peristiwa Hukum Perdata. Acta Comitas, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2016.v01.i02.p05

Widayati, W. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia yang Demokratis. PLEDOI: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v1i1.28

Yuliastuti, E., Sholahuddin, H., & Dewi Liarasari, L. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Tanah Melalui Mediasi: (Studi Kasus Nomor Surat Undangan Mediasi 405/Und-18.72.UP.04.07/IX/2020 Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Blitar). Yustitiabelen, 8(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v8i2.530

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16

How to Cite

Firda Adita Nurul Ihsani, & Grahadi Purna Putra. (2024). Praktik Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Kediri. Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, 2(4), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i4.1651

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.