Tinjauan Hukum Ketidakpatuhan Rusia Terhadap Provisional Measures International Court Of Justice (ICJ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i3.526Keywords:
Legal Review, Non-compliance, ICJ Provisional Measures, Interlocutory DecisionAbstract
This research discusses the Provisional Measure International Court of Justice (ICJ) for Russia's non-compliance in carrying out the decision. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal effectivity and legal consequences of Russia's non-compliance with the Provisonal Measure. The research method used is the normative research method. The outbreak of conflict between Russia and Ukraine This began with the joining of Ukraine and NATO for large-scale air drills in October 2018 which caused Russia's suspicions about its country's security. on February 21, 2022 was triggered by an acknowledgment from the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin on the declaration of independence of Donetsk and Luhanks against Ukraine and in this research discusses the Provisional Measure International Court of Justice (ICJ) for Russia's non-compliance in carrying out the decision. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal effectivity and legal consequences of Russia's non-compliance with the Provisonal Measure. The research method used is the normative research method. The outbreak of conflict between Russia and Ukraine This began with the joining of Ukraine and NATO for large-scale air drills in October 2018 which caused Russia's suspicions about its country's security. on February 21, 2022 was triggered by the recognition of the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin on the declaration of independence of Donetsk and Luhanks against Ukraine and on February 24, 2022 Russia announced a special military operation in Ukraine with the aim of demilitarization and denazification and has no orientation to occupy Ukraine .Therefore, Ukraine took steps to oppose Russia in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) with the result of the Provisional Measures. Russia must suspend military operations and refrain from any action that worsens the situation. Russia however rejects the Court's Jurisdiction claiming it does not apply the Genocide Covenant and argues Ar. 51 The United Nations charter of self-defense argued that the Ukrainian application was invalid and the case should be dismissed because Ar.51 is not ICJ Jurisdiction. Even though Article 41 of the International Statute states that "Provisional Measures" have binding power.
References
Abr Frowein, Jocben. “Provisional Measures by the International Court of Justice: The LaGrand Case.” Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law 11, no. 1 (1998): 1027–1034.
Arfiansyah, Taufieq Renaldi. “Daftar Sanksi Yang Dijatuhkan Kepada Rusia Atas Invasi Ukraina, Apa Saja?” Kompas.Com. Last modified 2022. Accessed November 7, 2022. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2022/03/05/123000765/daftar-sanksi-yang-dijatuhkan-kepada-rusia-atas-invasi-ukraina-apa-saja-?page=all.
Astawa, Kt. Diara. “Sistem Hukum Internasional Dan Peradilan Internaasional.” Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 27, no. 1 (2014): 35.
Bahiru, Bezabh Abebe. “Challenges of Dispute Settlement through International Court of Justice (ICJ): The Case of Ukraine v. Russian Federation, the Decision on Provisional Measures on Alleged Violation of Genocide Convention.” European Scientific Journal, ESJ 8 (2022): 266.
Bruggink, J.J.H. Refleksi Tentang Hukum. Edited by Arief Sidarta. Kedua. Bandung: Cipta Aditya, 2006.
Dewanto, W. A. Mahkamah Internasional. Sidoarjo: Citramedia, 2005.
Dukmadinata, Ana Syaodih. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2006.
Fahri, Faizal. “Daya Ikat Putusan Mahkamah Internasional: Analisis Penyerangan Militer Dan Paramiliter Amerika Terhadap Nikaragua.” The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence 2, no. 2 (2021): 263–283.
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2019.
Fajarianti, Aulia, Lia Dahlia Kurniawati, Ainun Alfasari Akbariah, Ibnu Abdul Jabar, and Fitri Yulyanti. “Sikap Politik Dan Hukum Internasional Indonesia Terkait Penyerangan Rusia Ke Ukraina” 2, no. 2 (2022): 386–397.
Hanan, Akhmad. “Bersama-Sama Mengupayakan Perdamaian Rusia Dan Ukraina.” Last modified 2022. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/opini/20220413115900-14-331310/bersama-sama-mengupayakan-perdamaian-rusia-dan-ukraina.
Hasim, Rudi. “Kajian Yuridis Invasi Rusia Ke Ukraina Tahun 2022 Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Humaniter Internasional.” Universitas Bung Hatta Padang, 2022.
Hermawati, and Yeni Widowaty. “Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat Sebagai Korban Pencemaran Lingkungan Akibat Pembakaran Lahan Pada Saat Panen Di Lampung Tengah.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum 3, no. 1 (2018): 383–395.
Kelsen, Hans. Teori Umum Tentang Hukum Dan Negara. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2008.
Kempen, Bernhard, and Zan He. “The Practice of the International Court of Justice on Provisional Measures: The Recent Development.” Heidelberg Journal of International Law 69, no. 2 (2009): 919–929.
Khoiroh, Isti Fadhatul. “Analisis Kebijakan Rusia Dalam Memperluas Jaringan Kerjasama Shanghai Coorperation Organization (SCO) Dengan India.” Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2021.
Kristanti, Liviani. “Kekuatan Mengikat Order Dari Mahkamah Internasional: Analisa Yuridis Kasus LaGrand Antara Jerman V Amerika Serika.” Calyptra: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya 8, no. 1 (2019): 711–719.
Kristanti, Liviani, Wisnu Aryo Dewanto, and Suhariwanto Suhariwanto. “Kekuatan Mengikat Order Mahkamah Internasional Pada Kasus Karl LaGrand.” KELUWIH: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2020): 60–67.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. Konsep-Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni, 2006.
Kusumaatmaja, Mochtar, and Etty Agoes. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2003.
Manik, L. “Sidik Pelanggaran HAM, PBB Imbau Rusia-Ukraina Hormati Warga Sipil.” Idntimes.Com. Last modified 2022. Accessed November 8, 2022. https://www.idntimes.com/news/world/leomanik/sidik-pelanggaran-ham-pbb-imbau-rusia-ukraina-hormati-warga-sipil-c1c2.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Megawati, Ayu. “Implikasi Ketidakpatuhan Republik Rakyat Tiongkok Atas Putusan Mahkamah Arbitrase Tetap Internasional Nomor 2013-19 Terhadap Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Di Laut Natuna.” Universitas Jember, 2017.
Najmi, Crystalia Shabrina. “Upaya Resolusi Konflik Dalam Perang Rusia-Ukraina 2022,” no. March (2022).
Prasetyo, Dicky Eko. Berkaca Dari Konflik Rusia Dan Ukraina. Surabaya, 2022.
Riza, Dina Alpia. “Implementasi Pelaksanaan Perda Nomor 47 Tahun 2002 Tentang Ketertiban Umum Studi Terhadap Gelandangan Dan Pengemis Di Kota Jambi.” Universitas Sriwijaya, 2018.
Sani De Ornay, Emanuel, and Nur Azizah. “Kepentingan Keamanan Nasional Rusia Dalam Serangan Militer Terhadap Ukraina Tahun 2022.” Jurnal Communitarian 4, no. 1 (2022).
Santoso, Hari Agus. “Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Teori Gustav Radbruch Dalam Putusan PKPU ‘PTB.’” Jatiswara 36, no. 3 (2021): 325–334.
Starke, G. John. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Sudiq, Rio Dwinanda, and Levina Yustitianingtyas. “Intervensi Rusia Terhadap Ukraina Pada Tahun 2022 Sebagai Pelanggaran Berat HAM.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha 10, no. 3 (2022): 101–117.
Suhendar, Milzril. “Penerapan Dissenting Opinion (Perbedaan Pendapat) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Warisan.” Universitas Medan Area, 2016.
Susetio, Wasis, Irman Jaya, Girindra Kayagiswara, Rizka Amelia Azis, and Elok Hikmawati. “Perang Rusia-Ukraina : Mencari Keseimbangan Dunia Baru.” Jurnal Abdimas 8, no. 5 (2022): 333–339.
Uno, Kasalla Lynk. “Analisis Ketidak Patuhan Jepang Terhadap Keputusan ICJ Pada Tahun 2014 Tentang Whaling In The Antarctic (Australia V.Japan: New Zealand Intervening).” Universitas Brawijaya, 2018.
Wicaksana, S. U. “Pakar Hukum UM Surabaya Paparkan Dampak Invasi Rusia Terhadap Ukraina Bagi Penerbangan Internasional.” Last modified 2022. Accessed November 8, 2022. https://www.um-surabaya.ac.id/homepage/news_article?slug=pakar-hukum-umsurabaya-paparkan-dampak-invasi-rusia-terhadap-ukraina-bagi-penerbanganinternasional%0D.
Winarwati, Indien. “Eksistensi Mahkamah Internasional Sebagai Lembaga Kehakiman Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB).” Rechtidee Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 1 (2014): 56–71.
