Analisis Pembuktian Dalam Sengketa Wanprestasi Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i3.1332Keywords:
Default, Sale and Purchase, Judgment, Dispute, LandAbstract
A land sale and purchase agreement is an important event in everyday life. However, this agreement often experiences problems, such as default. Default is the performance of an obligation that is not on time, resulting in the obligation for the debtor to provide or pay compensation. This article discusses the dispute in Supreme Court Decision No. 12/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Ptk. In this decision, the Plaintiff must pay court costs of Rp. 1,179,000 (one million seventy nine thousand rupiah). This article aims to identify the defaults that occurred and analyze the evidence of the parties in the trial. The research method used in researching this case study is the normative juridical method, which is a legal research method carried out by examining the implementation or implementation of rules in positive law (legislation) and written documents on certain legal events that occur in society. This default was committed by the Defendant, namely Burhanuddin, S.Pd., with the type of default being an act that was not in accordance with the contract. Based on the evidence presented by the parties, the Pontianak Court Judge stated that the defendant's decision was rejected because of the exception, regarding the lack of parties and Error in persona (wrong party) so that the plaintiff was ordered to pay all costs incurred in this case in the amount of Rp. 1,179,000 (one million one hundred seventy nine thousand rupiah).
References
Damayanti, D. A. A. (2020). Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Yang Tidak Dilakukan Dihadapan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Lex Privatum, 8(2).
Faradhiba, T. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Atas Tanah Antara Para Pemegang Hak. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Masyarakat, 14(3).
Febriana, N. T., & Darmoko, M. (2022). Langkah Hukum Terhadap Sengketa Tumpang Tindih (Overlapping) Atas Hak Sertifikat Tanah. Jurnal FH UBHARA, 11(1).
Gulu, F. A. (2017). Aspek Hukum Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Jual Beli Berdasarkan Kuhperdata. Legal Opinion, 5(4).
Khairunsyah, E., Purba, H., & Sembiring, R. (2021). A Legal Position Of Buying Binding Agreement Which Payment Is Made In Stages Which Has Been Canceled By The Supreme Court (Study Of Supreme Court Decision Number: 1650 K/Pdt/2015). Visi Sosial Humaniora, 2(2), 256-268.
Paendong, K. (2022). Kajian Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perikatan Dan Perjanjian Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata. Lex Privatum, 10(3).
Ramadhani, D. A. (2012). Wanprestasi dan Akibat Hukumnya. Jurnal Yuridis, 15(17), 135-140.
Republik Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Rifca, D. L. (2023). Analisis Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah Melalui Lelang Jaminan Dalam Mengurangi Resiko Penurunan Pendapatan Bank (Studi Bank Syariah Indonesia Area Lampung) (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).
Salim, H. S., S.H., M.S. (2003). Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. Jakarta.
Syahruddin, M. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Yang Disebabkan Pembeli Tidak Membayar Lunas Harga Tanah Yang Diperjanjikan. Lex Privatum, 10(5).
Warmadewa, I. M. A., & Udiana, I. M. (2017). Akibat hukum wanprestasi dalam perjanjian baku. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 2016.
