Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (PKB) dalam Perlindungan Jaminan Sosial Pekerja Berdasarkan Instrumen Ilo No. 102: Studi Kasus Putusan Ma Nomor 216 K/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2026

Melsa Oktapiansyah; Nuchraha Alhuda Hasnda

doi:10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2659

Authors

Melsa Oktapiansyah Program Studi Hukum, Universitas Nusa Putra
Nuchraha Alhuda Hasnda Program Studi Hukum, Universitas Nusa Putra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2659

Keywords:

Social Security, Workers

Abstract

This study examines the legal position of Collective Labour Agreements in protecting workers' social and economic benefits, with a specific focus on the preventive function of collective agreement clauses after the Supreme Court Decision Number 216 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2026. The legal issue does not merely concern the formal recognition of workers' social security rights, but the weakness of collective agreement clauses that fail to ensure registration, contribution transparency, benefit-claim assistance, access to information, and procedural safeguards before disputes reach litigation. This research applies a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. ILO Convention No. 102 concerning Social Security Minimum Standards is used as the main evaluative framework, while ILO Convention No. 98 is positioned as a supporting context for collective bargaining. The study argues that Collective Labour Agreements have a strong legal position as binding collective and contractual instruments, yet their protective function remains limited when clauses merely repeat statutory BPJS obligations without operational mechanisms. The Supreme Court decision demonstrates that workers' claims for work-related social and economic benefits may fail not because the underlying entitlement is necessarily irrelevant, but because procedural limitations prevent substantive examination. Therefore, collective agreements should be reconstructed as preventive, corrective, and contractual instruments that secure workers' social and economic benefits at the enterprise level.

References

BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. (2025). Integrated report 2024: Innovating with integrity, fostering loyalty. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. https://www.bpjsketenagakerjaan.go.id/

Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional. (2024). Laporan kinerja Program JKN Kuartal IV Tahun 2024. DJSN. https://kesehatan.djsn.go.id/

Husni, L. (2016). Pengantar hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.

International Labour Organization. (1949). Right to organise and collective bargaining convention, 1949 (No. 98). https://normlex.ilo.org/

International Labour Organization. (1952). Social security (minimum standards) convention, 1952 (No. 102). https://normlex.ilo.org/

Khairani, K., Darnis, D., Lubis, I., Oktaviandra, S., & Mardiah, A. (2025). Legal protection for vulnerable workers in the labor social security system in order to increase the participation of social security: A case study of Padang City. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 13(2), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i2.1597

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2026). Putusan Nomor 216 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2026.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.

Nasution, F. A. P., Tobing, H., Farizal, N., Siregar, S. A. H., & Muhyiddin, M. (2024). Study on the implementation of ILO Convention No. 98 in Indonesia and its comparison with developed and developing countries. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 19(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.47198/jnaker.v19i1.350

Pralitasari, N., Feby, D., & Hamid, L. F. (2023). Collective bargaining after labour law reform in Indonesia: An analysis on the WageIndicator Collective Bargaining Agreement Database. WageIndicator Foundation. https://wageindicator.org/

PT Glostar Indonesia, & PUK SP TSK SPSI PT Glostar Indonesia. (2023). Perjanjian Kerja Bersama PT Glostar Indonesia periode 2023–2025.

Rahayu, D., Munir, M., Wartiningsih, W., Shokhikhah, Z. K., & Thapa, N. Y. (2025). The rights-based labor law: A comparison of Indonesian and Nepal policies. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 7(1), 156–183. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v7n1.p156-183

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Republik Indonesia. (2004a). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Republik Indonesia. (2004b). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.

Republik Indonesia. (2004c). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional.

Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Tata Cara Pembuatan dan Pengesahan Peraturan Perusahaan serta Pembuatan dan Pendaftaran Perjanjian Kerja Bersama.

Republik Indonesia. (2021a). Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Program Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan.

Republik Indonesia. (2021b). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Program Jaminan Kehilangan Pekerjaan.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang.

Schiek, D. (2020). Collective bargaining and unpaid care as social security risk: An EU perspective. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 36(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.54648/IJCL2020020

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Weiss, M. (2020). Integration of social security law and labour law. In M. Olivier et al. (Eds.), The need for social security law and labour law reform in Southern Africa (pp. 5–16). African Sun Media. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928480839/02

Wijayanti, A. (2022). Hukum ketenagakerjaan pasca reformasi. Sinar Grafika.