Konstruksi Dar’u al-Mafasid dalam Putusan Hakim pada Perkara Perceraian Akibat Perselisihan Terus Menerus

Ahmad Ihksaludin; Yudi Wahyudin; Mumu Fahmudin; Abdul Kodir Alhamdani; Mohammad Husni Mubarok

doi:10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.2638

Authors

Ahmad Ihksaludin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah As-Sa’adah Sukasari
Yudi Wahyudin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah As-Sa’adah Sukasari Sumedang
Mumu Fahmudin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah As-Sa’adah Sukasari Sumedang
Abdul Kodir Alhamdani Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah As-Sa’adah Sukasari Sumedang
Mohammad Husni Mubarok Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah As-Sa’adah Sukasari Sumedang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.2638

Keywords:

Continuous Disputes, Dar'u al-Mafasid, Divorce, Judge's Decision, Maqasid al-Syari'ah

Abstract

The high rate of divorce due to continuous disputes in Religious Courts has prompted judges to use the jurisprudential maxim dar'u al-mafasid muqaddamun 'ala jalb al-mashalih as the normative basis for their legal considerations. However, the application of this maxim in judicial practice is often carried out disproportionately and without measurable standards, potentially producing decisions that are inconsistent with the objectives of Islamic law. This study aims to analyze the construction of the dar'u al-mafasid maxim in judges' decisions on divorce cases due to continuous disputes, evaluate its proportionality from the perspective of maqasid al-syari'ah, identify its construction patterns, and formulate an ideal and measurable construction model. This research employs a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, case, and philosophical-hermeneutic approaches. Legal materials were collected through documentation studies and analyzed qualitatively using content analysis, descriptive-analytical, comparative, and normative-evaluative techniques. The findings reveal that the construction of the dar'u al-mafasid maxim in judges' decisions is built through three stages: identification of mafsadat and maslahat, weighing (muwazanah) between them, and establishing priorities (awlawiyat); however, significant inconsistencies and disproportionality exist across various court levels. Three construction patterns were identified: fact-based, irreconcilability-based, and maqasid al-syari'ah-based. This study formulates an ideal construction model through five integrative stages: comprehensive fact verification, optimal reconciliation efforts, measurable mafsadat identification and assessment, proportional weighing integrating four dimensions of moderate jurisprudence, and maqasid al-syari'ah-based decision-making. This model is expected to serve as a guideline for Religious Court judges in producing substantively just decisions aligned with the objectives of Islamic law.

References

Darmawijaya, E., & Nordin, N. M. B. A. (2020). Praktik Ta’liq Talak Di Negeri Perak Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Islam. El-Usrah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 1(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v1i2.7633

Fauzizah, S. (2024). Analisis Maslahat Imam Al-Ghazali Dalam Penahanan Akta Cerai Sebagai Upaya Jaminan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Perempuan Setelah Perceraian. Bustanul Fuqaha Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v5i1.1125

Hasan, A. F. (2022). Landasan Filosofis, Sosiologis Dan Yuridis Terhadap Positivisasi Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Journal of Law Society and Islamic Civilization, 10(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v10i2.64944

Ibrohim, A. (2017). Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Pembatalan Putusan Pa Bangkalan No.0774/Pdt.G/2013/Pa.Bkl Oleh Putusan Pta Surabaya No.0014/Pdt.G/2014/Pta.Sby Tentang Perselisihan Dan Pertengkaran Terus Menerus Sebagai Alasan Perceraian. Al-Hukama, 7(1), 122–145. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2017.7.1.122-145

Ilba, H., & Turnip, I. R. S. (2024). Masa Enam Bulan Berpisah Tempat Tinggal Sebagai Syarat Formil Pengajuan Perceraian Dengan Alasan Pertengkaran: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 421 K/Ag/2023). As-Syar I Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(2), 1738–1754. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i2.6589

Islami, A. I. (2024). Measuring the Quality of Mashlahat and Madharat in the Decision of Marriage Dispensation. Khuluqiyya Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Studi Islam, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v5i2.113

Jayusman, J., & Huda, N. (2022). PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAH TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR: 1376/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Tnk TENTANG PENETAPAN HAK HADANAH KEPADA IBU KANDUNG. Ijtimaiyya Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 14(2), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijpmi.v14i2.10119

Jelita, A. D. P., Rachmainy, L., & Fakhriah, E. L. (2023). Penggunaan Saksi Anak Kandung Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Ditinjau Dari Pasal 145-146 Hir Dihubungkan Dengan Pasal 76 Undang-Undang Peradilan Agama Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Comserva Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(08), 3283–3296. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i08.1117

Lidinillah, A. M., & Aufa, M. N. (2023). Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perceraian Alasan Syiqaq. Hakam Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v7i1.6066

Lira, M. A. (2023). The Father’s Responsibility for the Fulfillment of Child Support Post-Divorce. Sign Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i2.291

Liza, R. L. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Perceraian Disebabkan Suami Biseksual (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pariaman Nomor 69/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Prm). Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, 3(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v3i1.467

Ludfi, L. (2023). Keharusan Ikrar Talak Di Depan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Perspektif Maqāṣid Syarī’ah Ibnu ‘Āsyūr. Maqashid Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.35897/maqashid.v6i1.1086

Muarif, M. S. (2020). Peran Hakam Dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat Dengan Alasan Syiqaq. Minhaj Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 1(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.52431/minhaj.v1i1.276

Muhammad, R. A., & Yulmina, Y. (2019). Multi Alasan Cerai Gugat: Tinjauan Fikih Terhadap Cerai Gugat Perkara Nomor:0138/Pdt.G/2015/MS.Bna Pada Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh. Samarah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 3(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v3i1.4399

Munir, A. (2022). Konsep Perceraian Di Depan Sidang Pengadilan Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syari’ah Ibnu Asyur. Mahakim Journal of Islamic Family Law, 3(2), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v3i2.86

Mustika, D. (2018). Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Jambi. Al-Risalah Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(02), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v15i02.370

Mustolich, M. (2021). Studi Kritis Terhadap Putusan Kasasi MA Nomor 1/K/Ag/2020 Tentang Alasan Perceraian. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v1i11.239

Nasution, M. A. (2018). Perceraian Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Dan Fiqh. Jurnal El-Qanuniy Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial, 4(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v4i2.2385

Nento, F., & Samsudin, T. (2018). The Case of Syiqaq in Judges’s Gorontalo Religion Court Perspective. Al-Mizan, 14(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v14i2.936

Nurhalisa, E. (1970). Pelaksanaan Mediasi Perkara Perdata Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah Menurut Al-Syatibi. Intizar, 26(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v26i2.7260

Sukur, M., & Shobahah, N. (2021). Syiqaq Sebagai Alasan Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung. Ahkam Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(1), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2021.9.1.175-192

Susylawati, E. (2019). Perselisihan Dan Pertengkaran Sebagai Alasan Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Ihkam Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 3(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v3i1.2598

Wahyudani, Z., Mukhlas, O. S., & Hakim, A. A. (2023). Aspek Pidana Dalam Hukum Keluarga Dan Penyelesaiannya Pada Lembaga Hukum Di Indonesia. Legalite Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 8(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v8i1.6197

Wati, E. D., Wahib, M., Faisal, F., & Harahap, A. A. (2023). Dimensi Fikih Moderat Dalam Putusan Hakim Atas Perceraian Yang Disebabkan Penyalahgunaan Aplikasi Karaoke Online. Jurisprudensi Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Perundang-Undangan Ekonomi Islam, 15(1), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i1.5613