Formulasi Pengaturan Permintaan Fotokopi Minuta Akta dan Pemanggilan Notaris sebagai Saksi dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana

Ananda Nurul Hidayah

doi:10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2622

Authors

Ananda Nurul Hidayah Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2622

Keywords:

Authority, District Court, Formulation, Notary Honorary Council, Seizure

Abstract

This study examines the legality of a District Court Chief Judge’s authorization for the seizure of a notarial deed minute without the approval of the Notary Honorary Council (MKN) and proposes a regulatory framework to balance the protection of the notarial office with the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement. The issue arises from the practice of law enforcement authorities relying on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) to obtain access to deed minutes without complying with the MKN approval mechanism required under the Law on the Office of Notary, resulting in legal uncertainty and institutional disharmony. This normative legal research employs statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through a literature review, legal document analysis, and interviews with the Regional MKN of East Kalimantan and the Riau Islands, and were analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that Article 66 of the UUJN constitutes a lex specialis provision that prevails over the general provisions of the KUHAP regarding access to deed minutes and the summoning of notaries. Consequently, seizure authorizations issued without MKN approval may result in procedural defects. The study recommends harmonizing regulations through amendments to the UUJN, strengthening the authority of the Central MKN, and issuing a Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) to guide judicial implementation.

References

Aruan, U. M. (2014). Tata cara penyitaan barang bukti tindak pidana menurut KUHAP. Lex Crimen, 3(2), 77–85.

Effendi, L., & Kustina, S. (2000). Hukum administrasi (Administratief recht). Biro Konsultasi dan Bantuan Hukum.

Gunaryo, A. (2011). Beberapa catatan tentang konsep hukum H.L.A. Hart dalam buku The Concept of Law. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 3(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.3.1.69

Hamzah, A. (1986). Kamus hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.

Harahap, M. Y. (2003). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Penyelidikan dan penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.

HR, R. (2007). Hukum administrasi negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kadir, Z. K. (2024). Menulis ulang keadilan: Bagaimana doktrin suppression of evidence dalam preseden Amerika Serikat menata kembali prosedur peradilan pidana. Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2(4), 1–18.

Katz, L., & Sandroni, A. (2023). Circumvention of law and the hidden logic behind it. University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4507434

Kenedi, J. (2017). Kebijakan hukum pidana (Penal policy) dalam sistem penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar.

Latifah, M. (2021). Perlukah mengatur prinsip exclusionary rules of evidence dalam RUU Hukum Acara Pidana? Negara Hukum, 12(1), 101–122.

Lemley, M. A. (2016). The fruit of the poisonous tree in IP law. Iowa Law Review, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2867099

Moeljatno. (2010). Hukum acara pidana. Seksi Kepidanaan Fakultas Hukum UGM.

Murtadho, N. A. (2025). Bukti ilegal dalam RUU KUHAP Indonesia: Exclusionary rules dan due process of law. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 23(23), 291–308.

Muwahid. (2017). Metode penemuan hukum (rechtsvinding) oleh hakim dalam upaya mewujudkan hukum yang responsif. Jurnal Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 7(1), 224–248.

Purbacaraka, P., & Soekanto, S. (1983). Perundang-undangan dan yurisprudensi. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Reidt, A. (n.d.). The admissibility of secondary evidence: Is the US-American fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine being replaced by the balancing exercise?

Widiada, M. P., Kasih, D. P. D., & Kasih, N. P. D. (2018). Eksistensi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 4(3), 1–17.

Winarno, N. B. (2008). Penyalahgunaan wewenang dan tindak pidana korupsi. Laksbang Mediatama.

Zuliah, A., & Amalia, F. (2025). Penerapan adagium lex specialis derogat legi generalis dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Law Jurnal, 5(2), 124–125.