Implikasi Yuridis Penerapan Perkara Koneksitas dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi berdasarkan Undang-Undang KPK

Muh. Fahmi Ramadhani; Amirrudin Hanafi; Vivi Nur Qalbi

doi:10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2620

Authors

Muh. Fahmi Ramadhani Universitas Tadulako
Amirrudin Hanafi Universitas Tadulako
Vivi Nur Qalbi Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2620

Keywords:

Connected criminal cases, Corruption Eradication Commission, Corruption offenses, Legal certainty, Military courts

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal implications of implementing the concept of connected criminal cases (koneksitas) in corruption offenses as regulated under Article 42 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, as amended by Law Number 19 of 2019, in relation to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XXI/2023. Connected criminal cases involve offenders subject to both general and military jurisdictions, creating legal issues regarding the determination of the competent judicial institution to examine and adjudicate such cases. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources, including legislation and court decisions, as well as secondary legal sources, such as books, journals, and other relevant legal literature. The findings indicate that Article 42 of the KPK Law grants the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) the authority to handle connected criminal cases, provided that the law enforcement process is initiated by the KPK, as reaffirmed by Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XXI/2023. Nevertheless, overlapping authority between the KPK and military courts continues to create jurisdictional conflicts in practice. Furthermore, connected criminal cases are more frequently resolved through case splitting (splitsing) rather than joint investigation teams, potentially leading to inconsistent judicial decisions. The study concludes that the implementation of connected criminal cases in corruption offenses still faces legal challenges due to regulatory disharmony and weak institutional coordination, highlighting the need for clear technical guidelines to ensure legal certainty and effective corruption eradication

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Ilmu hukum tata negara. Jimly Asshiddiqie. http://www.jimly.com/pemikiran/getbuku/4

Baehaki, K. (2025). Jurnal media hukum. Jurnal Media Hukum, 10(1), 1–13.

Budhiyani, A. A. (2014). Tinjauan yuridis urgensi pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Recidive, 3(1), 36–43.

Darto, A., Alam, A. S., & Purwaningtyas, F. D. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan pengidap gangguan kejiwaan dalam perspektif hukum pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra, 1(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.38156/jihwp.v1i2.128

Hamka, L. B., Basir-Cyio, M., & Kasim, A. (2022). Reevaluation of the concept of state losses in corruption: Analysis in the perspective of restorative justice. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(12), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2022.61229

Hamzah, A. (2016). KUHAP dan KUHP. Rineka Cipta.

Kasim, A., Rimi, A. M., Abdurrahim, Supriyadi, & Purnamasari, A. I. (2023). Restorative justice to prevent village fund corruption crimes: A constitutional law and Indonesian criminal law perspective. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 18(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756207

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2010). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Manik, G. P. P. (2019). Pelaksanaan peradilan perkara koneksitas di lingkungan peradilan militer.

Nur, S. M. (2021). Penerapan pendidikan anti korupsi kepada siswa sekolah dasar. Eduscience: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6, 111.

Pakpahan, K., et al. (2021). Jurnal Mercatoria. Jurnal Mercatoria, 16(1), 91–98.

Pramono, B. (2020). Peradilan militer Indonesia. Scopindo Media Pustaka.

Rachmawati, A. F. (2022). Dampak korupsi dalam perkembangan ekonomi dan penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Eksaminasi: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 12–19.

Remmelink, J. (2003). Hukum pidana: Komentar atas pasal-pasal terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia (M. Termorshuizen-Arts, Ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Rifandhana, R. F. (2016). Kewenangan Pengadilan Militer Utama dalam melakukan pengawasan peradilan militer. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v7i1.1781

Sangapan, L. H., Manurung, C., Manurung, R., Manurung, A., & Manurung, A. H. (2025). Penegakan hukum korupsi di Indonesia: Perspektif systematic literature review (2010–2023). Imperium Research: Law Science and Politics Journal, 1(1), 1–9.

Syamsuddin, A. (2017). Kajian tentang anggota militer yang melakukan tindak pidana dalam perkara koneksitas menurut KUHAP. Lex Crimen, 6(6), 64–71.

Syamsudin, M. (2011). Rekonstruksi pola pikir hakim dalam memutuskan perkara korupsi berbasis hukum progresif. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.11

Wahid, A., Intan, A., & Mardin, N. (2020). Vicarious liability model of political party on election criminal actions. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 8(1), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i1.1063

Wahyuningrum, K. S., Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2020). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Benarkah ada? Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p239-258

Waluyo, B. (2014). Optimalisasi pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Yuridis, 1(2), 169–182.