Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Perjanjian Jasa Parkir Tanpa Pemberian Bukti Transaksi Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen

Dimas Aditya Rahman

doi:10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2336

Authors

Dimas Aditya Rahman Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2336

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Parking Services, Transaction Evidence, UUPK, Validity of Agreements

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal position of the relationship between managers and users of parking services according to the Civil Code, as well as to assess the validity of parking service agreements without proof of transaction in the perspective of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of the research show that based on Article 1320 of the Civil Code, a parking service agreement which is a custody agreement remains valid and binding even if it is not accompanied by written evidence, as long as it meets the requirements for a valid agreement. However, from the perspective of the Consumer Protection Law, the failure to provide transaction evidence constitutes a violation of the business operator's duty of good faith and the consumer's right to clear information. This creates legal uncertainty and weakens the consumer's position in seeking compensation, especially if accompanied by an exculpatory clause prohibited by law. Translated with DeepL.com (free version).

References

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen

Buku

Sibarani, B. E., Aslindar, D. A., Wulandari, S., Natalina, S. A., Mandarana, M., Mujiani, S., ... & Sari, D. M. (2022). Pengantar Akuntansi 1: Perusahaan Dagang dan Jasa. Pradina Pustaka.

Parera, A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Polis Akibat Wanprestasi Terkait Dengan Perjanjian Baku Dalam Polis Asuransi Jiwa. Penerbit Andi.

Jurnal

Pratama, A. Y. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemakai Jasa Parkir Atas Pencantuman Klausula Baku (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).

Hasanudin, M. N., Muzakka, M. R., Kholid, M. A., Munawir, A., Nurrozikin, M. T., & Arrosyid, S. H. (2025). Pengantar Hukum Perikatan dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perikatan. Ariyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Bisnis, 1(1), 71-82.

Nengsih, E. Y., Fithroh, M., Anfal, S., Hakiki, R., & Saputra, B. A. (2025). Hukum perikatan: Macam-macam perikatan. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 3(1), 193-206.

Sari, P., & Harahap, M. Y. (2024). Eksistensi asas konsensualisme dalam perjanjian kerja sama bagi hasil perkebunan kelapa berdasarkan kuhperdata. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.544

Tanjaya, W., & Wijaya, E. T. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Hukum Bisnis Terhadap Penyelesaian Kasus Wanpestasi. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 9(2), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.31933/rynrzt05

Randut, K., & Sutrisno, A. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pengelolaan Fasilitas Parkir dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Kasus Kehilangan Barang di Penyediaan Layanan Penitipan Kendaraan DKI Jakarta). HUMANIORUM, 3(2), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.37010/hmr.v3i2.92

Filmadina, N., Monica, T., Setiawan, F., & Adonara, F. F. (2025). Pengembangan Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Era Digitalisasi di Ekonomi Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(5), 5889-5898.

Dewi, N. M. C. K., Sukadana, D. A. P., Putra, K. S. W., & Yuliantari, G. A. E. (2025). Pelanggaran Asas Itikad Baik Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata Oleh Pihak Pertama Dalam Kontrak Sewa. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(6), 10712-10718.

Putusan

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3416/Pdt/1985