Arbitrase Daring di Tengah Gelombang Digitalisasi terhadap Analisis Relevansi Tantangan dan Perubahan Proses Hukum

Moch. Gufron Fajar Rezki; Eka Wahyu Setyawan; Nur Qoilun

doi:10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2290

Authors

Moch. Gufron Fajar Rezki Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif
Eka Wahyu Setyawan Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif
Nur Qoilun Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2290

Keywords:

Digital Infrastructure, Electronic Evidence, Justice System Transformation, Legal Process Digitalization, Online Arbitration

Abstract

Online arbitration has emerged as a significant innovation in dispute resolution systems in the digital era, as information technology has become the primary foundation for various legal activities. This mechanism offers a new way to resolve disputes through the use of digital platforms that enable parties to interact without geographical boundaries. This study aims to analyze the relevance, challenges, and changes in legal processes brought about by online arbitration in the modern context. Using a juridical-normative method, the study examines the applicable legal framework, doctrine, and academic literature to understand how digitalization affects arbitration procedures. The analysis shows that online arbitration has strategic value because it can provide efficiency, flexibility, and accessibility not always found in conventional arbitration. However, its implementation still faces various issues, such as data security, technological capability gaps, the integrity of electronic evidence, and the lack of comprehensive legal standards. On the other hand, digitalization has also driven significant changes in the structure of procedural law, including the simplification of procedures and the expansion of the recognition of electronic evidence. This study confirms that the success of online arbitration requires regulatory harmonization, increased technical capacity of the parties, and strengthening of digital infrastructure so that it can function as an effective, fair, and adaptive dispute resolution mechanism to technological developments.

References

Asnawi, M. I., Fitriani, R., Tala, W. S., Tarigan, J. A. P., Daffa, T. M., & Habibi, W. (2024). Pelaksanaan penyelesaian sengketa perdata melalui arbitrase di negara berkembang. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 4(3), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v4i3.402

Ayu, A. S., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2025). Perlindungan hukum terhadap investor melalui prinsip keterbukaan dalam mekanisme securities crowdfunding (SCF). Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(3), 1338–1361. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.12438

Azzahra, N. A., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2024). Dampak perbedaan akses teknologi terhadap kesenjangan sosial ekonomi. Jurnal Akademik Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 1(4), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.61722/jaem.v1i4.3491

Dewi, A. A. (2021). Arbitrase online di era revolusi industri 4.0 dan pandemi Covid-19. JLR: Jurnal Legal Reasoning, 3(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.35814/jlr.v3i2.2409

Fikriyah, U. (2019). Peran aktif hakim dalam pemeriksaan keterangan saksi dalam persidangan: Menuju hakim yang profesional pada era kemajuan teknologi informasi. Al-’Adalah, 22(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.35719/aladalah.v22i2.19

Judijanto, L., Febryani, E., Marizal, W., & Salmon, H. C. J. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis penggunaan digital justice untuk akuntabilitas dan efisiensi sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Sanskara Hukum dan HAM, 3(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v3i02.497

Makruf, S., Pratama, B. Y., Muslimah, A. N., Pratama, M. I., & Shaleh, C. (2025). Teori hukum dan filsafat hukum: Membangun responsivitas terhadap perubahan ekonomi dan sosial. Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah, 10(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.32505/muamalat.v10i1.9614

Matheus, J. (2021). E-arbitration: Digitization of business dispute resolution pada sektor e-commerce dalam menyongsong era industri 4.0 di tengah pandemi Covid-19. Lex Renaissance, 6(4), 692–704. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss4.art4

Novitasari, I., & Abbas, R. Y. (2025). Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa perdata di era digital: Upaya perlindungan merek dalam ekosistem e-commerce Indonesia. Semarang Law Review, 6(2), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v6i2.12621

Riston, R., & Basoddin, B. (2025). Fungsi digital forensik dalam pembuktian tindak pidana siber (Studi kasus di Polda Sultra). Sultra Law Review, 7(1), 3744–3756. https://jurnal-unsultra.ac.id/index.php/sulrev/article/view/1185

Rohaini, & Adhnan, S. (2024). Masa depan arbitrase Indonesia: Efektivitas dan kepastian hukum. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.

Rohendi, H. A. (2025). Hukum bisnis digital: Regulasi, etika, dan perlindungan di era ekonomi digital. PT Kimhsafi Alung Cipta.

Sanubari, S. (2024). Arbitrase dan media sosial. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 54(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol54.no3.1667

Sulistianingsih, D. (2023). Penggunaan online dispute resolution (ODR) pada penyelesaian sengketa melalui arbitrase di Indonesia. Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif, 1(2), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.15294/hp.v1i1.106

Sunarto. (2024). Transformasi menuju pelayanan berkarakter: Implementasi nilai-nilai reformasi birokrasi di lembaga peradilan. Prenada Media.

Sutiarso, C. (2011). Pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase dalam sengketa bisnis. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Syarifuddin, S., Din, T., Andriani, T., Vanchapo, A. R., Tinambunan, H. S. R., & Sawlani, D. K. (2024). Reformasi hukum di era digital: Tantangan dan peluang di Indonesia. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 4(4), 3206–3215. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i4.1685

Wibowo, A. (2023). Penyelesaian sengketa hukum dan teknologi. Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.

Wibowo, Mukti, A., Iftitah, A., Dewi, P. M., Dzulhijjah, L., Musthofa, M. A. A., H. P., Z. F. D., & Junaedi, M. (2024). Perkembangan hukum keperdataan di era digital. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Zaman, A. A. P. (2025). Keabsahan pembuktian digital forensik terhadap tindak pidana pencucian uang melalui mata uang virtual (cryptocurrency) (Studi komparatif di beberapa negara).