Studi Kritis Pemikiran Tokoh Sosiologi Terhadap Pendidikan Islam

Authors

  • Maysa Latifa Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Yasinta Nurul Hidayat Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Yuliana Yuliana Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Januar Januar Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i1.837

Keywords:

Thought, Figures, Sociology, Islamic Education

Abstract

The purpose of this discussion is to find out the thoughts of educational sociologists Emile Durkheim, Aguste Comte, Max Weber, Karl Max, and George Simmel regarding Islamic education. This discussion uses the library research method using data sources from journals and books related to the discussion theme. The research results showed that educational sociology figures such as Emile Durkheim, Aguste Comte, Max Weber, Karl Max, and George Simmel were sociological figures from the classical era. Emile Durkheim pioneered the development of sociology through research on societal institutions and social processes as well as his thoughts on Islamic education. Aguste Comte stated that sociology must be based on observation, comparison, experiments and historical methods. Max Weber, he introduced the vestehen (understanding) approach, which consists of exploring the values, beliefs, goals and attitudes that guide people's behavior which gives rise to social behavior. Karl Max stated that sociology can be used as a weapon to liberate society from the capitalist system so that a classless society can be achieved, and according to George Simmel society is a process that is ongoing and continuously developing. So, the thoughts of sociological figures regarding education are that schools cannot be separated from society, cooperation between schools and community figures needs to be formed, the child socialization process needs to be improved so that children are able to grow and develop in society.

References

Afifuddin. (2015). pendidikan dengan pendekatan marxis-sosialis. Jurnal Adabiyah, 15, 189–203.

Arif, arifuddin m. (n.d.). perspektif teori sosial emile durkheim dalam sosiologi pendidikan. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 1, 1–14.

Bahari, Y. (2021). pemikiran tokoh-tokoh sosiologi klasik dan prakteknya dalam pemecahan masalah sosial. Top Indonesia.

Haryono, satrio dwi. (2022). wacana rasialisme dalam sosiologi max weber. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Dan Humaniora, 13, 400–410.

Hasanah, U. (2019). Konstribusi Pemikiran Auguste Comte (Positivisne) Terhadap Dasar Pengembangan Ilmu Dakwah. Al-I’lam Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 2(2), 70–80.

Jailani, M. (2019). tokoh sosiologi klasik. Jurnal Universitas Islan Negeri Sumatera Utara, 34.

Maksum, A. (2016). Sosiologi pendidikan. Malang: Madani.

mubin noho, F. (n.d.). konsep sosiologi pendidikan. Kajian Pendidikan Keislaman, 11, 65–79.

Muzaki, Y. A. (2023). Analisis Ideologi Augute Comte (Positivisme dan Implementasikan Pendidikan Islam). Jurnal Suluah Pasaman Pendidikan Dan Dakwah Agama Islam, 2(2), 9–10.

Nugroho, I. (2016). positivisme aguste comte analisa epistemologis dan nilai etisnya terhadap sains. Jurnal Cakrawala, 167–177.

Olatunji, B. &. (2021). Max Weber’s Conception of Ethical Education: An Insight Into Character Development. Internasional Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRSSH), 11(3), 187–189.

Susanto, A. (2020). biografi tokoh-tokoh sosiologi. Jurnal IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press, 4–20.

Syukur, M. (2018). dasar-dasar teori sosiologi. Jurnal Pt Rajagrafindo Persada, 71.

Wahyu. (2020). sosiologi tokoh teori dan bebagai pemikiranya. Tahura Media, 31–32.

Wahyuni. (2017). sosiologi klasik. Jurnal Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (PKM) Rumah Buku Carabaca Makasarr, 157.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-09

How to Cite

Maysa Latifa, Yasinta Nurul Hidayat, Yuliana Yuliana, & Januar Januar. (2023). Studi Kritis Pemikiran Tokoh Sosiologi Terhadap Pendidikan Islam. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 3(1), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i1.837