Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas 3 MI Plus Walisongo Trenggalek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i3.1415Keywords:
Cooperative think pair share type, Learning results, MI plus walisongoAbstract
The purpose of this research is to determine the influence of the Think Pair Share Type Cooperative Learning Model on student learning outcomes and how much influence the Think Pair Share Type cooperative learning model has on the learning outcomes of Class 3 MI Plus Walisongo Trenggalek students. Quantitative research methods are methods where research data is in the form of numbers and analysis uses statistics. The type of research that will be carried out in this quantitative research has an experimental design. The design form of this experimental research is quasi experimental. The population of this study was all 38 grade 3 students at MI Plus Walisongo Trenggalek consisting of class 3A and class 3B. Data collection techniques use test methods and documentation methods. The data analysis technique consists of testing the requirements that need to be calculated/tested, namely normality and homogeneity. The technique used is the independent sample t-test technique, which is to determine the coefficient of difference between two data distributions. The use of the t-test technique is intended to see whether there are significant differences between the two samples from the control class and the experimental class. The results of the research show that based on the results of data analysis it shows that tcount is 4,684 > from ttable 1,688, which means that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. In conclusion, there is an influence of the Think Pair Share Type Cooperative Learning Model on the learning outcomes of Class 3 MI Plus Walisongo Trenggalek students. How much influence the Think Pair Share Type Cooperative Learning Model has on the learning outcomes of Class 3 MI Plus Walisongo Trenggalek students can be proven by the results of Sig. is 0.000. Because the Sig value. 0.000 < real level (= 0.05).
References
Ariani, R. (2019). Analisis landasan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi pendidikan dalam pengembangan multimedia interaktif. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(2), 155–162.
Arifin, Z. (2017). Evaluasi pembelajaran.
Basyit, A. (2019). Madrasah dan sekolah Islam elit di Indonesia. Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pencerahan, 15(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.31000/rf.v15i1.1366
Darmawan, D. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kuantitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Eliashvili, M., Tsitsishvili, G., & Japaridze, G. (2016). The quantum group and Harper equation on a honeycomb lattice. Journal of Mathematical Sciences (United States), 216(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-016-2909-8
Fitri, A. Z., & Haryanti, N. (2020). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, mixed method dan research and development. Madani Media.
Haryanti, N. (2019). Metode penelitian ekonomi. Bandung: Manggu.
Haryanti, N., Putra, T., & Putrianingsih, S. (2022). Analisis motivasi belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial di kelas V SDI Miftahul Huda Plosokandang Kedungwaru Tulungagung tahun ajaran …. Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(3), 1057–1072.
Maisyaroh, I., Abdullah, M., & Hadi, M. N. (2023). Model asesmen sumatif dengan menggunakan metode library research untuk mata pelajaran pendidikan agama Islam (PAI) pada kurikulum merdeka. Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan, 04(03), 274–287.
Mastur, & Haryanti, N. (2022). Layanan pendidikan anak lamban belajar (slow learner) di sekolah. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 6(2), 437. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v6i2.1006
Mutohar, P., Masrokan, & Haryanti, N. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif aplikasinya dalam bidang pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Perdana, N. S. (2019). Evaluasi pelaksanaan pembelajaran model teaching factory dalam upaya peningkatan mutu lulusan. Jurnal Serunai Administrasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.37755/jsap.v7i1.116
Qutni, D. (2018). Efektivitas integrasi kurikulum dalam pembentukan karakter peserta didik (studi di SMP Daarul Qur’an Internasional Tangerang Internasional Pesantren Tahfizh Daarul Qur’an). TAHDZIBI: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.24853/tahdzibi.3.2.103-116
Ruhana, F. (2018). Analisis peran lembaga pemberdayaan masyarakat desa dalam perencanaan pembangunan desa di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan, 5(2), 133–148.
Setia Siregar, U. (2023). Evaluasi pembelajaran pada kurikulum 2013 dengan kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Al Burhan, 3(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.58988/jab.v3i1.100
Siregar, S. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif: Dilengkapi dengan perbandingan perhitungan manual dan SPSS.
Soejono, & Abdurrahman. (2019). Metode penelitian: Suatu pemikiran dan penerapan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Sudaryono. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan (pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulistio, A., & Haryanti, N. (2022). Model pembelajaran kooperatif. Purbalingga: Eurika Media Aksara.
Trianto. (2010). Model pembelajaran terpadu.
Trianto. (2012). Model pembelajaran terpadu.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Setyaning Utami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
