Nisan Tanpa Keadilan: Menelisik Tragedi Kanjuruhan Yang Belum Menemukan Titik Terang

Authors

  • Nadia Nadia Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Imroatuth Thoyyibah Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Fitriana Ashari Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Laela Kurnia Nafitasari Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Didi Pramono Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i3.1402

Keywords:

Abuse of Authority, Conflict, Kanjuruhan

Abstract

Humans in their lives have many interests and goals, so it is inevitable that conflicts and quarrels may occur due to conflicting interests. The Kanjuruhan tragedy was a bloody conflict that claimed hundreds of lives, which was caused by many factors, one of which was the difference in interests that led to abuse of authority. One of the main problems according to the community's perspective in the Kanjuruhan phenomenon was the firing of tear gas by the police. The police at that time became stewards by complying with all the regulations set by FIFA and at the same time had a role as law enforcers and obeyed the laws in force in Indonesia. For this reason, this article aims to discuss how the Kanjuruhan incident occurred, through the analysis of Dahrendorf's conflict perspective theory and how the Authority at that time played its role. This article is prepared with a research method using a qualitative approach, namely the literature study method and analysis of the Watchdoc Documentary Youtube channel.

References

Alfarisi, S & Hakim, M. (2019). Hubungan Sosiologi Hukum Dan Masyarakat Sebagai Kontrol Sosial. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Vol. 1, No. 2, hal 20.

Chaterine, R. N. (2022, October 3). UPDATE Jumlah Korban Tragedi Kanjuruhan: 330 Lukaluka dan 125 Meninggal Dunia. Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/10/03/18374251/update-jumlah-korban- tragedikanjuruhan-330-luka-luka-dan-125-meninggal

Demartoto, A. (2023). Teori Sosiologi Modern: Ralf Dahrendorf. Spada Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret.

FIFA. (n.d.). FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations. Retrieved from FIFA website:https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/682f5864d03a756b/original/xycg4m3h1r1zudk7rn kb-pdf.pdf

Hamid, S. S. N., Ramadhan, D. A., & Kusumadinata, A. A. (2023). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Media Narasi Tentang Tragedi Kanjuruhan Malang. Karimah Tauhid, 2(1), 51-59.

Ibrahim, A. (2022, Oktober 5). Penampakan Pintu 13 Saksi Bisu Mencekamnya Tragedi Kanjuruhan. Retrieved from detikNews: https://news.detik.com/foto-news/d- 6331084/penampakan-pintu-13-saksi-bisu-mencekamnya-tragedi-kanjuruhan/2

Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 3, 121-132.

Kanjuruhan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Dan Masyarakat Indonesia. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 1(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v1i3.349

Kasim, F, & Nurdin, A. (2015). Sosiologi Konflik Dan Rekonsiliasi: Sosiologi Masyarakat Aceh. 1st ed. Aceh: Unimal Press.

Komara, I. (2022, October 5). Pilu Di Pintu 13 Kanjuruhan, Kesaksian Korban tentang Jeritan Minta Tolong. detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6330671/pilu- di-pintu-13-kanjuruhan-kesaksian-korban-tentang-jeritan-minta-tolong

Memorandum, A. M. (2022). Peradi Nilai Tragedi Kanjuruhan Murni Pelanggaran HAM. Retrieved from Memorandum.co.id website: https://memorandum.co.id/peradi-nilai-tragedikanjuruhan-murni-pelanggaran- ham/

Mulyadi Mulyadi, Alma Felicia Togatorop, Putri Sarah, Nathasya Irish Rachelninta, Nasya Zulaekha Algamar, & Dias Prima Laurenza. (2023). Analisis Peristiwa

Nendissa, J. E. (2022). Teori Konflik Sosiologi Modern Terhadap Pembentukan Identitas Manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Undiksha, 4(3), 69-76.

Pratomo, M. D. (2022). Suasana Mengerikan dan Mencekam Pintu 13 Stadion Kanjuruhan. Retrieved from sport.detik.com: https://sport.detik.com/sepakbola/liga-indonesia/d-6340623/suasana- mengerikan-dan-mencekam-pintu-13-stadion-kanjuruhan

Purwanti, A. A. (2022, October 7). Tertutupnya Pintu 13 stadion Kanjuruhan jadi Titik paling Banyak Memakan Korban. pramborsfm. https://www.pramborsfm.com/news/pintu-13-stadion-kanjuruhan-dan-jumlah- gas-air-mata-yang-renggut-nyawa/all

Putra dkk. (2024). Keadilan dan Perlindungan HAM:Refleksi Tragedi Kanjuruhan.

Ramadhan et a. (2023). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Media Narasi Tentang Tragedi Kanjruhan Malang. Karimah Tauhid, 2.

Ruth Meliana Dwi Indriani. (2022, October 6). 14 Temuan Hasil Investigasi The Washington Post Soal Tragedi Kanjuruhan. suara.com. https://www.suara.com/news/2022/10/06/191123/14-temuan-hasil-investigasi- the-washington-post-soal-tragedi-kanjuruhan

Safutra, I. (2022, October 12). Paparan gas air mata Bisa Picu Gagal Napas, Kebutaan, Kematian. Paparan Gas Air Mata Bisa Picu Gagal Napas, Kebutaan, Kematian - JawaPos.https://www.jawapos.com/kesehatan/01412940/paparan-gas-air-mata- bisa-picu-gagal-napas-kebutaan-kematian

Tualeka, M. W. N. (2017). Teori konflik sosiologi klasik dan modern. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal studi Agama-agama, 3(1), 32-48.

Utama, K. W., Sukmadewi, Y. D., Saraswati, R., & Putrijanti, A. (2022). Tragedi Kanjuruhan Dan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Pelaksanaan Prosedur Administrasi Negara. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(4), 414-421.

Wibawana. (2022). Tragedi Kanjuruhan: Kronologi, Penyebab dan Jumlah Korban. DetikNews. Diakses pada https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6324274/tragedi- kanjuruhan-kronologi-penyebab-dan-jumlah-korban.

Published

2024-07-23

How to Cite

Nadia Nadia, Imroatuth Thoyyibah, Fitriana Ashari, Laela Kurnia Nafitasari, & Didi Pramono. (2024). Nisan Tanpa Keadilan: Menelisik Tragedi Kanjuruhan Yang Belum Menemukan Titik Terang. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 3(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i3.1402