Analisis Hukum terhadap Kesenjangan Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan dalam Kasus Pengalihan Hak Paten Konstruksi Sarang Laba Laba di Indonesia

Intan Maharani; Muh Amin Saleh

doi:10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2491

Authors

Intan Maharani Universitas Mpu Tantular
Muh Amin Saleh Universitas MPU Tuntular

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2491

Keywords:

Legal certainty, justice, patent rights, Spider Web Construction, intellectual property

Abstract

This study analyzes the gap between legal certainty and justice in patent protection in Indonesia through a case study of the transfer of patent rights for the Spider Nest Construction. The problem formulation includes two things. First, what is the form of distortion of legal certainty in the transfer of patent rights. Second, how is the violation of the inventor's moral and economic rights and the institutional factors that cause it. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that the distortion of legal certainty occurs because the registration of the transfer of rights only uses a Power of Attorney without an authentic deed, which violates Article 11 of the Patent Law. In addition, the unilateral action of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property to freeze and revoke the freezing of patents without a court decision violates Article 132 of the Patent Law. Violation of moral rights is manifested in the form of false attribution in the JALLA patent. Economic rights are ignored through embezzlement of royalties. The peak of injustice is the accusation of plagiarism against the original inventor for his own development invention. Inhibiting factors include institutional weaknesses within the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, excessive judicial intervention, low human resource capacity, regulatory disharmony, and an unsupportive legal culture. Strengthening strategies include institutional reform, revision of the Patent Law, ratification of international conventions, digitalization, international certification, and the establishment of a specialized intellectual property court. In conclusion, without strengthening integrated intellectual property legal policy, the gap between procedural legal certainty and substantive justice will continue to weaken the national innovation ecosystem.

References

Adolf, H. (2021). The Meaning of Public Policy Under Indonesian Arbitration Law and Practice. Transnational Business Law Journal, 2(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.23920/transbuslj.v2i1.646

Apriyanto, A., Haryanti, T., Sari, L., Sepriano, S., & Safitri, N. (2024). Buku Referensi Hukum Perdata : Teori dan Praktik. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Berlianty, T. (2023). Hukum Organisasi Perusahaan. Zifatama Jawara.

Darusman, Y. M. (2016). Kedudukan Serta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Paten dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional Indonesia dan Hukum Internasional. Yustisia, 5(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8732

Ebenstein, L. (2018). Routledge Revivals: The Greatest Happiness Principle (1986): An Examination of Utilitarianism. Routledge.

El Hafiz, S., & Buku, D. (2023). Teori Pilihan Rasional. Teor. Sos. Dari Klas. Sampai Postmod, 1(1), 19.

Emirzon, H. J., & Sadi, M. (2021). Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Praktik. Prenada Media.

Fadli, Z., Suryamizon, A. L., Riyanto, A., Bhakti, R. T. A., Bidari, A. S., Adriaman, M., Syuryani, S., Irianto, K. D., Rusli, B., & Rahmayani, N. (2023). Hukum Bisnis Era Modern. CV. Gita Lentera.

Faisal, A. (2025). Dinamika dan Perkembangan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital. Graf Literature.

Ferinda, F. (2024). Arbitrase di Indonesia, Antara Aturan dan Praktik. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/arbitrase-di-indonesia--antara-aturan-dan-praktik-lt66843a0eb5d85/

Irianto, K. D., Susanti, E., Natsir, M. K. K., Munira, M., Sari, Y. M., Novitasari, I., Masthura, N., Hanim, L., Arman, Z., & Mirfa, E. (2025). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perikatan. CV. Gita Lentera.

Jacob, R., Chave, L., & Fisher, M. (2022). Guidebook to intellectual property. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Jannah, S. (2018). Pengaruh Pelatihan Quiet Eye Training Terhadap Peningkatan Konsentrasi pada Atlet Bulutangkis. Jural Character, 3.

John, R. (2017). Justice as fairness. In Power, Authority, Justice & Rights (pp. 192–218). Routledge.

Juliardi, B., Runtunuwu, Y. B., Musthofa, M. H., TL, A. D., Asriyani, A., Hazmi, R. M., Syahril, M. A. F., Saputra, T. E., Arman, Z., & Rauf, M. A. (2023). Metode penelitian hukum. CV. Gita Lentera.

Karsoma, A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Paten Alpahankam. In Bandung: PT Alumni. Bumi Aksara.

Khaerurrizal, K., Firmanto, T., & Adnan, A. (2025). Kewenangan Badan Arbitrase Nasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1241

Latumeten, P. E. (2017). Reposisi Pemberian Kuasa dalam Konsep Volmacht dan Lastgeving Berdasarkan Cita Hukum Pancasila. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol47.no1.133

Miru, A., & Pati, S. (2020). Hukum Perjanjian: penjelasan makna pasal-pasal perjanjian bernama dalam KUH Perdata (BW). Sinar Grafika.

Nottage, L., Teramura, N., & Tanna, J. (2024). Lawyers and non-lawyers in international arbitration: discovering diminishing diversity. Loy. LA Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 47, 139.

Nugraha, A. M. R. P. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Hak Paten di Dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional di Indonesia. Binamulia Hukum, 11(1), 1–14.

Nurfitri, D. (2023). Pengantar Hukum Paten Indonesia. Penerbit Alumni.

Nurmawati, B., Iryani, D., & Setiawan, P. A. H. (2024). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. MEGA PRESS NUSANTARA.

Ombudsman. (2025). Strengthening Oversight, Advancing Maladministration Prevention.

Purnobasuki, H., Efendi, F., Wahyuni, I., Harisanty, D., Saraswati, A., & Abadi, A. (2023). Strategi Penulisan Deskripsi Paten. Airlangga University Press.

Ramadhani, M., Amirulloh, M., & Faisal, P. (2021). Perlindungan terhadap inventor terkait unsur kebaruan paten yang hapus akibat tidak membayar biaya tahunan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.26905/ idjch.v12i1.4717

Rizkia, N. D., & Ferdiansyah, H. (2022). Intellectual Property Rights An Introduction. In Widina Bhakti Persada (Vol. 3). Widina Bhakti Persada.

Rohaini, & Sepriyadi, A. (2024). Masa Depan Arbitrase Indonesia: Efektivitas dan Kepastian Hukum. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.

Saidin, H. (2002). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual,/(Intellectual Property Rights).

Setiyowati, W. S., & Mardiana, M. (2022). Profitabilitas terhadap financial distress dimediasi corporate social responsibility. IQTISHODUNA Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 18(1), 51–62.

Sierrad, M. Z. (2022). Larangan Pengalihan Hak Moral Dan Pembatasan Waktu Dalam Perjanjian Jual Putus Hak Cipta Buku Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v1i1.5

Sinaga, D. S. L., & Susanti, C. (2025). Batalnya Putusan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Akibat Ketidaknetralan Arbiter. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 11(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v11i1.432

Sipayung, P. D., Endah, M. Y., Putra, R. K., Astuti, S. A., & Sri YulianingsihAhmad Burhanuddin. (2025). Perikatan Dalam Hukum Perdata. PT. Nawala Gama Education.

Sopamena, R. F. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2(1), 1–15.

Sudjana, S. (2021). Pelindungan Paten Dalam Perspektif Fungsi Hukum Sebagai Kontrol Sosial Dan Rekayasa Sosial. Dialogia Iuridica, 13(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3757

Suyatno, S. S. (2023). Kelemahan Teori Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence M. Friedman Dalam Hukum Indonesia. IUS FACTI: Jurnal Berkala Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Karno, 2(1 Juni), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.61802/if.v2i1%20Juni.447

Tarigan, A. (2018). Tumpuan Keadilan Rawls. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Triyudiana, A., & Neneng, P. (2024). Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Sebagai Fairness Menurut John Rawls Di Indonesia Sebagai Perwujudan Dari Pancasila. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2(01).

Utama, T. S. J., & Sari, A. C. F. (2024). Aspek-aspek yang Terabaikan dalam Pendaftaran Tanah Desa Adat di Bali. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.7.1.43-74

Wijesinghe, S. S. (2023). Intellectual Property Rights of the Investors and Regulatory Autonomy of the States: A Critical Analysis of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement on Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Measures. APIIT LJ, 2, 7.

Zuami, M. D. A., & Tresnawati, B. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Paten Akibat Dihapusnya Kepemilikan Hak Paten Dari Daftar Umum Paten. Jurnal Juristic, 1(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v1i01.1486