Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi pada Kejahatan Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Restoratif

Authors

  • Budi Handayani Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i1.2483

Keywords:

Corporate Liability, Ecological Restoration, Environmental Crime, Independent Audit, Restorative Justice

Abstract

Environmental crimes committed by corporations cause broad ecological, social, and economic impacts on society and environmental sustainability. However, the system of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia still tends to rely on a retributive approach through fines and imprisonment of corporate managers. This approach is considered ineffective because it has not been able to restore environmental damage and fulfill the rights of affected communities. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of corporate criminal liability in environmental crimes and reconstruct a restorative justice-based model of criminal responsibility. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that the reconstruction of corporate criminal liability should focus on environmental restoration through ecological rehabilitation mechanisms, compensation for affected communities, ecological penal mediation, and independent environmental audits. The restorative justice approach provides opportunities for corporations to take concrete responsibility for the environmental damage they cause so that environmental law enforcement is not merely punishment-oriented, but also aimed at environmental recovery and social justice.

References

Afriana, A., & Suhartono, S. (2021). Corporate criminal liability in environmental crimes in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 12(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i2.17718

Arief, B. N. (2016). Kebijakan formulasi pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam penanggulangan kejahatan lingkungan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5(2).

Atmasasmita, R. (2012). Teori hukum integratif. Kencana.

Fitriani, R. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana lingkungan hidup. Jurnal IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(3).

Hamzah, A. (2016). Penegakan hukum lingkungan. Sinar Grafika.

HS, S. (2014). Hukum penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup. Sinar Grafika.

Kurniawan, M. B. (2020). Restorative justice approach in environmental law enforcement. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 20(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2020.20.3.2986

Lestari, E., & Santoso, B. (2019). Penegakan hukum pidana lingkungan terhadap korporasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.345

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.

Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Kencana.

Nugroho, A. S. (2022). Environmental law enforcement and restorative justice mechanism in Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 11(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.808

Prasetyo, T. (2020). Penerapan restorative justice dalam penegakan hukum lingkungan. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 9(1).

Putri, R. A., & Hadi, S. (2021). Implementation of restorative justice in environmental dispute resolution. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 9(3), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i3.1047

Rahmadi, T. (2015). Hukum lingkungan di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2018). Penelitian hukum normatif. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sutedi, A. (2017). Hukum perizinan dalam sektor pelayanan publik. Sinar Grafika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Wibisana, A. G. (2021). Penegakan hukum lingkungan melalui pendekatan restoratif. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(4).

Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Budi Handayani. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi pada Kejahatan Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Restoratif. Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, 2(1), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i1.2483

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.