Pendeportasian Orang Asing dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional: Ancaman Hukuman Mati dan Pemenjaraan Jangka Panjang

I Gusti Putu Anom Kresna Wardhana; Jayadi Al Amien

doi:10.55606/srj-yappi.v4i3.2614

Authors

I Gusti Putu Anom Kresna Wardhana Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jayadi Al Amien Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/srj-yappi.v4i3.2614

Keywords:

Deportation, Human Rights, Immigration, International Fugitive, State Sovereignty

Abstract

Indonesia, as a sovereign state, has the absolute right to regulate the deportation of foreigners within its territory. However, in modern law, state sovereignty is no longer absolute but relative, where its implementation must refer to universal international human rights norms. This study aims to analyze the reciprocal relationship between state sovereignty and human rights enforcement in the context of the deportation of foreigners in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that state sovereignty and human rights in deportation function to limit and test each other. Sovereignty provides exclusive rights for national security through the implementation of selective policy, while international human rights law exists as a barrier so that such coercive actions do not exceed humanitarian values. In conclusion, deportation actions in Indonesia must refer to human rights norms during the deportation process. Then the state also has the absolute right to enforce immigration law in the form of deportation so as to prevent a country from becoming a refuge for criminals or international fugitives who flee to and reside in Indonesia, or carry out their criminal activities within the country.

References

Arsani, M. M. (2020). Penerapan Deportasi Terhadap Warga Negara Asing Di Wilayah Indonesia Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Denpasar: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Baren Sipayung, S. O. (2023). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, Vol. 7, No. 1.

Bolhuis, M. (2023). Aftermath of Dutch International Crimes Cases. Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 21 No. 1, 141.

China, M. o. (2023-2025). Supreme People’s Court of China, Annual Report on Judicial Protection of Telecom Fraud and Cross-Border Criminal Cases.

Christiano, A. (2020). Pengkajian Dampak Regulasi RUU EKstradisi Terhadap Ekonomi Masyarakat Indonesia. Dialogia Iuridica, Vol. 11, No. 2, 25-45.

Darnela, L. (2011). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum.

Deng, F. M. (1996). Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Dewi, L.A.K. (2019) ‘Pendeportasian Warga Negara Asing yang Berada di Wilayah Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia’, Journal of Law and Border Protection, 1(1), pp. 101–112.

Divhubinter. (2026). Diambil kembali dari Tugas dan Fungsi NCB-Interpol Indonesia: https://interpol.go.id

Hathaway, J. C. (2005). The Rights of Refugees under International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ji-Seong, P. (2015). A Study on the Abolition of the Death Penalty for Economic Crimes in Chinese Criminal Law. Chinese Law Review, Vol. 23 , 223.

Konstitusi, M. (2007). Putusan Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1997 tentang Narkotika terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Kurniawan, L. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Atas Kebijakan Selective Policy dalam Penanganan Warga Negara Asing yang Masuk Ke Indonesia Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Periode Tahun 2020. Syntax Literate.

Office, U. S. (2026, Maret 01). Diambil kembali dari Little Sioux Man Sentenced to 50 Years in Federal Prison for Sexual Exploitation of a Minor and Possession of Child Pornography: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdia/pr/little-sioux-man-sentenced-50-years-federal-prison-sexual-exploitation-minor-and

Rattan, J. (2019). Changing Dimensions of Intervention Under International Law: A Critical Analysi. SAGE Open, Vol. 9.

Red Notices. (2026, Juni 03). Diambil kembali dari Red Notices: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/Red-Notices

Renata, J. (2021). Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ilmu Hukum.

Sabila, Y. (2019). Landasan Teori Hak Asasi Manusia dan Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia. ResearchGate.

Schachter, O. (1991). International Law in Theory and Practice. 254.

Shaw, M. N. (2017). International Law, 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Soering. (1989). Application No. 14038/88. Judgment, 91.

Supreme People's Court of China. (2023) Chinese Courts Clamp Down on Fraud. English Court News, 26 September. Diakses pada 5 Juni 2026, dari: https://english.court.gov.cn/2023-09/26/c_946106.htm

The Business Times. (2026) Fugitive tycoon behind shady investment scheme detained in Indonesia. The Business Times, 3 Juni. Diakses pada 5 Juni 2026, dari: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). G.A. Res. 217 A (III).

Veronika Karolina Simamora, Y. M. (2024). Peran Rumah Detensi Imigrasi dalam Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Deteni: Studi Penelitian di Rumah Detensi Imigrasi Medan. International Journal of Sociology and Law, Vol. 1, No. 4.

Wood, M. J. (2009). The Principle of Non-Intervention. Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, No. 2, 345.