Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Aparatur Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pengawasan pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Ciamis

Authors

  • Yoppi Hidayat Jauhari Universitas Galuh
  • Ading Rahman Sukmara Universitas Galuh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jimas.v3i4.1722

Keywords:

performance improvement strategy, implementation of supervision, Ciamis Regency Inspectorate

Abstract

This research is motivated by the fact that the Ciamis Regency Inspectorate apparatus has not performed well in carrying out supervision in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 61 of 2019. In the Ciamis Regency Inspectorate, this can be seen from the results of the Ciamis Regency Inspectorate performance report, several problems were found. The purpose of this study is to determine the strategy for improving the performance of the apparatus in implementing supervision at the Ciamis Regency Inspectorate. This study used a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The informants in this study were 4 people, namely the Inspector, Secretary of the Inspectorate, Head of Planning and Programs and representatives of regional inspectors. Data analysis was carried out on data collected from both observation and interview results. The data analysis stage was carried out with qualitative analysis. The results of the study showed that: 1) The performance of the apparatus at the Ciamis Regency Inspectorate was not optimal, this was because the Inspectorate as one of the supervisory institutions responsible to the Regent had not been able to create transparency, objectivity, more effective supervision efficiency, and more accumulative and accountable. Therefore, the Inspectorate is not only faced with the problems of functional tasks but also with coaching tasks. 2) The implementation of supervision in carrying out its activities as a supervisor of the implementation of regional government cannot be separated from the factors that influence the implementation of the supervisory function carried out on the implementation of regional government. These factors are: internal factors, namely the number of supervisory officers is still limited, and external factors, namely the availability of many mandatory tasks that must be carried out and negligence of the object of inspection. 3) The Inspectorate as an internal supervisor is required to make a major contribution to improving the quality of the implementation of Regional Government, but on the other hand, its capacity is not yet sufficient to carry out its main tasks and functions with various problems and limitations.

References

Alwi, S. (2001). Manajemen sumber daya manusia, strategi keunggulan kompetitif. BPFE UGM.

Baharun, H., Enas, E., & Noviana, R. L. (2022). Quality improvement as a strategy to build pesantren’s brand credibility. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1583

Budianto, A., Bastaman, I. D., & Herman, F. (2020). Promotion mix, individual internal environment, and purchase decision making in minimarket. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 21(1).

Darna, N., Faridah, E., Lestari, M. N., & Tinia, A. G. (2024). Talent management in facing the demand of environmental changes: A study in Galuh University. Sosiohumaniora, 26(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v26i1.47161

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. (1996). Organisasi: Perilaku, struktur, proses (N. Adriani, Trans.). Binarupa Aksara.

Mangkunegara, A. A. (2001). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moekijat, S. (1995). Manajemen personalia dan sumber daya manusia. Mandar Maju.

Moenir, S. (1992). Manajemen pelayanan umum di Indonesia. Bumi Aksara.

Mulyatini, N., Herlina, E., Akbar, D. S., & Prabowo, F. H. E. (2023). Analisis potensi pembentukan kawasan industri hasil tembakau dalam perspektif ekonomi. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.29210/020231920

Mulyatini, N., Herlina, E., Faridah, E., & Rozak, D. A. (1860). Human capital management model: A perspective of internal supervision in Indonesia. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(1), 1860–1868. http://www.iratde.com

Nuryani, L. K., Enas, E., Herman, M., Wahyudi, E., & Dianawati, L. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of academic supervision in a pandemic era; phenomenological review. AL-TANZIM: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v6i3.3646

Peraturan Bersama Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia dan Kepala Badan Kepegawaian Negara Nomor 22 dan Nomor 03 Tahun 2010, tentang petunjuk pelaksanaan jabatan fungsional pengawas penyelenggaraan urusan pemerintahan di daerah dan angka kreditnya.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 23 Tahun 2007, tentang pedoman tata cara pengawasan atas penyelenggaraan daerah.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 61 Tahun 2019 tentang perencanaan pengawasan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah tahun 2020.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2009, tentang jabatan fungsional pengawas pemerintahan pada inspektorat kabupaten/kota.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 12 Tahun 2017 tentang pembinaan dan pengawasan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2016 tentang organisasi perangkat daerah.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2016). Perilaku organisasi (16th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Sari, P., Muzaki, I. S., Mulyatini, N., Faridah, E., & Prawiranegara, B. (2019). Local own revenue, decentralization and local financial independence. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 19(3), 250. https://doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v19i3.2413

Simamora, B. (2001). Manajemen sumber daya manusia (3rd ed.). STIE YKPN.

Thoha, M. (1993). Kepemimpinan dalam manajemen: Suatu pendekatan perilaku. Raja Grafindo Pustaka.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30