Sanksi Hukum Anak Yang Membunuh Ibu Tirinya Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Hukum Pidana
( Studi Putusan Nomor 823/Pid.B/2019/PN Kis )
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.654Keywords:
Crime, Murder. Al-QatluAbstract
This research discusses the legal sanctions for children who kill their stepmother which occurred in Pulo Bandring District, Asahan Regency. This research will analyze the Kisaran District Court Decision Number.823/Pid.B/2019/PN.Kis, which aims 1. To find out what the provisions are for legal sanctions for children who kill their stepmother from a criminal law perspective, 2. What are the provisions for legal sanctions for children who killing his stepmother according to the perspective of Islamic criminal law, and 3. What are the legal considerations of the judge in making a decision regarding the child who killed his stepmother (Decision Study Number.823/Pid.B/2019/PN.Kis). This research uses Normative Law, which is research that examines document studies, namely using legal source materials. The results of the research in this study are: 1. A person can be said to be the perpetrator of the crime of murder and has fulfilled the elements of the crime of murder, and has been proven to have committed the crime of murder with supporting evidence, which states clearly that the person has committed the crime. criminal act of murder. 2. Not only criminal law, Islamic criminal law also regulates sanctions for perpetrators of criminal acts of murder. The crime of murder by intentionally taking another person's life in Islamic criminal law is categorized as Al-Qatlu. 3. When formulating a case, a judge must first consider the creation of fair law in society. In Decision No. 823/Pid.B/2019/PN.KIS in considering the law the judge made a decision using alternative charges. Although the alternative indictment consists of several layers, only one will be proven. Proof does not need to be carried out sequentially according to the layers, but directly to what is deemed proven. Because Article 338 of the Criminal Code has been clearly proven, based on the element of who and the element of intentionally taking another person's life, then in decision No. 823/Pid/B/2019/PN.KIS the judge decided that the defendant was caught in the second alternative charge, namely Article 338 of the Criminal Code, namely intentional murder, to which evidence was attached which was obtained at the scene of the crime. So the judge decided that the defendant was subject to imprisonment for 10 (ten) years.
References
Audah. A.Q, et al, Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Anak, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 1994, jilid II.
Ali Zainuddin, 2007, Hukum Pidana Islam Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Beirut, 2005, Libanon: Dar al-Kitab al-Alamiyah.
Basyir Azhar Ahmad, 2001, Ikhtisar Fiqih Jinayat Hukum Pidana Islam Yogyakarta: UII Press Anggota IKAPI.
Chazawi Adami, 2018, Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh dan Nyawa, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada
Dillaphilips, dan Suratman, 2014, Metode Penelitian Hukum Bandung: Alfabeta Cv.
H. Ishaq, 2018, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
H. Ishaq, 2014, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia PHI Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Effendi Erdianto, 2011, Hukum Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Didu .S, 2008, Hak Asasi Manusia (Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Internasional), Bandung:Iris Press
Gunarsa, 2006, Psikologi Perkembangan dan Dewasa, Jakarta.
Indrawati, Endang Sri dan Nailul Fauziah. 2012. Attachment Dan Penyesuaian Diri Dalam Perkawinan. Jurnal Psikologi Undip. Vol. 11, No.1.
Irfan .N, et al, 2015, Fiqih Jinayah, Jakarta: PT. Amzah
Lubis .Z, 2016, Dasar-dasar Hukum Acara Jinayah, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Lubis AJ. 2006. Dukungan Sosial pada Pasien Gagal Ginjal Terminal yang Melakukan Terapi Hemodialisis. Universtas Sumatera Utara.
Moelijatno, 1993, Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
Kamelia, 2015, Tindak Pidana Ikan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009 tentang perikanan ditinjau dari Fiqih Jinayah Skripsi: UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.
Marpaung Leiden, 1991, Unsur-unsur Perbuatan yang dapat Dihukum, Jakarta: Grafika.
Mardani, 2019, Hukum Pidana Islam Jakarta: Kencana.
Moeljatno, 1993, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Maramis Frans, 2012, Hukum Pidana Umum dan Tertulis di Indonesia Jakarta: Rajawali Pers..
Renggong Ruslan, 2016, Hukum Pidana Khusus Memahami Delik-delik di Luar KUHP Jakarta: Kencana.
Raghib Fahmi, Ariman Rasyid, Hukum Pidana Malang: Setara Press.
Ramiyanto, 2010, Sanksi Pembunuhan Secara Berkelompok dalam Hukum Pidana ditinjau dari Fiqih Jinayah Skripsi: IAIN Raden Fatah Palembang.
Soekanto, Soejono, 2008, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia UI Pers.
Siti Rahayu, Hamzah, 1983, Suatu Tinjauan Ringkas Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Syamsu Ainul Muhammad, 2016, Penjatuhan Pidana dan Dua Prinsip Dasar Hukum Pidana Jakarta: Kencana.
Syamsuddin Rahman, 2014, Mengenal Hukum Indonesia Makassar: Alauddin University Press.
Saebani Ahmad Beni, Hasan Mustofa, 2013, Hukum Pidana Islam Fiqhi Jinayah Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.
Tomalili Rahmanuddin, 2019, Hukum Pidana Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Zuleha, 2017, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Karjadi, M dan R. Soesilo. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Sukabumi: Politeia-Bogor, 1998.
Soesilo, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Sukabumi: Politeia-Bogor, 1988.
Moeljatno, 1996, KUHP (kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana), Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Jamilah Fitrotin, 2014, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Dunia Cerdas.
