Tinjauan Fiqh Jinayah terhadap Sistem Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Malaysia

Fauzan Habibi Lubis; Noor Azizah; Lukman Hakim Harahap

doi:10.55606/eksekusi.v4i2.2474

Authors

Fauzan Habibi Lubis Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Noor Azizah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Lukman Hakim Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i2.2474

Keywords:

Anti-Corruption Enforcement, Comparative Law, Corruption Evidence, Islamic Criminal Law, Reverse Burden of Proof

Abstract

The crime of corruption manifests a pathological excretion of endemic crime and methodically destroys the foundations of state governance integrity and the teleological equilibrium of social justice holistically. The two jurisdictions between Indonesia and Malaysia are entangled in substantial epistemo-procedural complexity in the process of constructing evidence of corruption cases, crossing both from the positive legal dimension and the register of judicial ethics. This comparative study investigates the divergence and convergence trajectories that color the epistems of proof of corruption in both countries, with an analytical concentration focused on the doctrine of burden of proof inversion. By deploying a juridical-normative paradigm strengthened through comparative legal hermeneutics, the results of the study indicate that although Indonesia and Malaysia both implement a reversal mechanism of the burden of proof, the two countries exhibit striking heterogeneity in the procedural intensity and normative restrictions imposed. Malaysia prioritizes a balance between the effectiveness of institutional law enforcement and the prerogative of fundamental rights, while Indonesia shows a more aggressive vector in prosecuting disproportionately unexplained accumulated assets. Islamic criminal law strengthens the imperative of law enforcement through the postulates of substantive justice and the absolute prohibition of the practice of risywah. At its core, the effectiveness of proving corruption requires the availability of an architecturally adaptive legal system, a law enforcement apparatus with unparalleled integrity, and an ethical framework sublimated from the principles of universal justice.

References

Ali, M. (n.d.). Menolak Tindak Pidana Pasar Modal Dalam Perkara PT Asuransi Jiwasraya Sebagai Korupsi Rejecting The Capital Market's Criminal Act In The Case Of Life Insurance Limited As Corruption. Jurnal Ius Constituendum.

Azizah, N., & Ramadhani, M. F. (2025). A Review of Islamic Criminal Law Finances in the Perspective of Islamic Law. Journal Dandelions, 5(1).

Cahyani, T. D., Said, M. H. M., & Hassan, M. S. (n.d.). A Comparison Between Indonesian and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Laws.

Dahlan. (2021). Distorsi Beban Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Sistem Dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Hukum, 18(1), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v18i1.3288

Edyar, B., Hayati, I., & Saputra, K. (2024). Korupsi Dalam Telaah Ayat Ahkam.

Haque, S. M. (n.d.). Analisis Hukum Pidana Islam Terhadap Pemggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Positif Dan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.

Hasan, O. H. (n.d.). Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Al-Qa'zaf.

Hatta, M., Sumiadi, Z., & Afrizal, T. Y. (n.d.). Ratio Legis Penerapan Beban Pembuktian Terbalik Di Indonesia (Komparasi Hukum Pidana Indonesia).

Hidayatullah, S. (2023). Perkembangan Dan Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Islam Sebagai Sumber Hukum Di Indonesia. SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 797–806. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2369

Jones, D. S. (2020). 1MDB Corruption Scandal in Malaysia: A Study of Failings in Control and Accountability. Public Administration and Policy, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-11-2019-0032

Karim, A., et al. (2022). Dato' Sri Mohd Najib Hj Abd Razak. Judgement Express, 3(21).

Kartika, A., et al. (2024). Law Enforcement in the Recovery of State Funds from Corruption Crimes. Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 20(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i2.63799

Laa Dee, M. (n.d.). HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERKARA PIDANA (Cet. I).

Luthfi, H., & Kasdi, A. (2024). Analisis Pembuktian Melalui Media Elektronik Positif Dan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 3(2), 181–193.

Muhtarom, Z., et al. (2016). Pidana Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum.

Novianti, & Fadila. (2023). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.

Nst, A. S. (2023). Analysis of Strengthening the Regulation on the Handling of Corruption Evidence and Asset Forfeiture for the Economic Recovery of State. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a7

Ong, C., & Lian, K. S. (2022). Journal of Financial Crime.

Prayitno, A. H., et al. (2025). Reversed Burden of Proof in the Procedural Law of Corruption Cases: A Normative Study of Justice and Legal Certainty in Positive and Islamic Law. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 12(1), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.8182

Purnama, B. A., Mulyadi, M., & Robert, R. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pencucian Uang Dalam Bentuk Investasi Reksadana (Analisis Bukti Rekaman Video CCTV).

Ritonga, N. H. (2025). The Position of The Defendant's Statement as Evidence in The Perspective of Islamic Criminal Justice. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v9i2.27417

Robot, M. (2022). Alat Bukti Sebagai Petunjuk Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Oleh Penyandang Disabilitas Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, September 2021.

Rockhmadi. (2015). HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM (Cet. I). CV. Karya Abadi Jaya.

Sumiadi, L. M., Rasyid, L., & Irwali, I. (n.d.). Corruption Crimes in Indonesia.

Trisnawati, & Saleh, A. H. (2024). Integration of Islamic Values in Anti-Corruption (A Secondary Data Study on Public Perception of Corruption and Religion). Journal of Islamic and Social Studies, 2(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.30762/jiss.v2i2.2523

Transparency International Malaysia. (2021). Laporan 2021.

Ulfa, O. S., & Achyar, G. (2023). BARANG BUKTI DALAM TINJAUAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM, 1(1), 10–21.

Widijowati, D. (2023). The Crime of Corruption Codified in Law Number 1 of 2023. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), e1859. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1859

Zurnetti, A., Wahyuni, F., & Rahmah, S. (2021). Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Di Indonesia (Cet. I). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.