Konsolidasi Hegemoni Neoliberal melalui Agenda Global Governance Wef Pasca Krisis 2008

Authors

  • Alindha Cahyani Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i2.2345

Keywords:

2008 Financial Crisis, Global Governance, Neoliberal Hegemony, Non-state Actors, World Economic Forum

Abstract

This paper analyzes the role of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in shaping global governance after the 2008 financial crisis using a non-state-centric global governance perspective. It examines how the WEF, through various agendas such as the Global Redesign Initiative, Fourth Industrial Revolution, and The Great Reset, positions itself as a key actor in formulating responses to global instability. Despite promoting a narrative of collaboration, inclusivity, and multi-stakeholder partnerships, the analysis shows that the WEF actually refines and reproduces neoliberal hegemony through the dominance of private actors, market-based approaches, and undemocratic normative authority. This study also finds that the global governance mechanisms promoted by the WEF tend to widen inequality, create symbolic participation, and reinforce the power of the global economic elite. These findings highlight the normative dilemma in contemporary global governance and the need for a more accountable, inclusive, and public interest-oriented governance model.

References

Allouche, J., Middleton, C., & Gyawali, D. (2015). Technical veil, hidden politics: Interrogating the power linkages behind the nexus. Water Alternatives, 8(1), 610–626.

Barton, C. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Promise or peril? In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Technology and Society (pp. 302–309). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462215

Chowdhury, A., & Żuk, P. (2018). From crisis to crisis: Capitalism, chaos and constant unpredictability. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 29(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304618811263

Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01202006

Dremova, E. (2019). Economic aspects for ensuring justice in the context of the industrial development system formation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(5), 1408–1414.

Elias, J. (2013). Davos woman to the rescue of global capitalism: Postfeminist politics and competitiveness promotion at the world economic forum. International Political Sociology, 7(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12015

Jay, O. (2011). The Global Agenda Council on the ageing society: Policy principles. Global Policy, 2(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00053.x

Likić-Brborić, B. (2024). Business-led governance of migration and development: A challenge for civil society. In Handbook on migration and development: A counter-hegemonic perspective (pp. 367–384). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907131.00034

Luckhurst, J. (2017). The shifting global economic architecture: Decentralizing authority in contemporary global governance. Springer.

Luckhurst, J. (2019). The G20 hub of decentralizing global governance authority. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(2), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2019-02-01

Luckhurst, J. (2020). Networks decentralizing authority in global economic governance. In The future of global economic governance: Challenges and prospects in the age of uncertainty (pp. 29–41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35336-0_3

Marshall, A. (2015, January 20). World Economic Forum: A history and analysis. Transnational Institute. Retrieved May 26, 2025, from https://www.tni.org/en/article/world-economic-forum-a-history-and-analysis

Masters, L. (2021). Africa, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and digital diplomacy: (Re)negotiating the international knowledge structure. South African Journal of International Affairs, 28(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2021.1961605

McNeill, D. (2023). The World Economic Forum: An unaccountable force in global health governance? Global Policy, 14(5), 782–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13254

Napolitano, G. (2011). The two ways of global governance after the financial crisis: Multilateralism versus cooperation among governments. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(2), 310–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor038

Owjimehr, S., & Samadi, A. (2023). Energy transition determinants in the European Union: Threshold effects. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(9), 22159–22175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23743-w

Özkul, F., & Bayram, S. (2023). Great reset and the new deal after COVID-19. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b20387

Prügl, E., & True, J. (2014). Equality means business? Governing gender through transnational public-private partnerships. Review of International Political Economy, 21(6), 1137–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.849277

Putri, S. A. (2018). Penyebab krisis finansial global tahun 2008: Kegagalan financial development dalam mendorong pertumbuhan dan stabilitas ekonomi. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.20473/jhi.v11i1.5853

Roth, S. (2021). The great reset of management and organization theory: A European perspective. European Management Journal, 39(5), 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.05.005

Saqer, A. (2023). Repackaging growth at Davos: The World Economic Forum’s inclusive growth and development approach. Review of International Political Economy, 30(3), 914–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2070522

Shaw, T. (2016). Lisbon and EPAs: What prospects for regional development in Africa and the Caribbean? In The EU’s Lisbon treaty: Institutional choices and implementation (pp. 243–264). Taylor & Francis.

Walker, C. (2021). Climate change and risk to workers: Piecing together the puzzle. In Identifying and managing risk at work: Emerging issues in the context of globalisation (pp. 9–111). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164029-10

Wang, W. (2018). China and G20: From a think tank case perspective. In Think tanks and emerging power policy networks (pp. 31–39). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71955-9_3

World Economic Forum. (n.d.). Our mission. Retrieved May 26, 2025, from https://www.weforum.org/about/world-economic-forum/

Downloads

Published

2026-05-10

How to Cite

Alindha Cahyani. (2026). Konsolidasi Hegemoni Neoliberal melalui Agenda Global Governance Wef Pasca Krisis 2008. Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 4(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v4i2.2345

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.