Kritik terhadap Keadilan Formal ; Memahami Positivisme dan Modernitas dalam Pemikiran Fransiscus Budi Hardiman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i2.1800Keywords:
Budi Hardiman, Formal Justice, Legal Thought, Modernity, PositivismAbstract
Modern legal thought is often dominated by the positivism school, which emphasizes legal certainty through written rules and formal procedures. However, this approach often overlooks the substantial aspect of justice, namely the sense of justice that lives within society. Fransiscus Budi Hardiman, in his work Melampaui Positivisme dan Modernitas (Beyond Positivism and Modernity), offers sharp criticism of formal justice that focuses solely on legality without considering morality and human values. This study aims to analyze Hardiman’s thoughts in the context of criticism against positivism and its impact on legal life in Indonesia. Using a philosophical approach and a qualitative-descriptive method, this study finds that Hardiman encourages a reinterpretation of law that is not only legal-formal but also humanistic and contextual. This perspective is relevant in addressing various legal cases in Indonesia, which often reveal a gap between legal decisions and the public's sense of justice. This study is expected to contribute to the development of a legal theory that is more responsive and adaptive to social dynamics.
References
Asli, M. A. (2017). Pemetaan tesis dalam aliran-aliran filsafat hukum dan pelajari metodologisnya. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum.
El Muhtaj, M. (2017). Hak asasi manusia dalam konstitusi Indonesia (2nd ed.). Kencana.
FNN. (2024, January 4). Cawapres produk putusan tanpa etika. FNN. https://fnn.co.id/post/cawapres-produk-putusan-tanpa-etika (Accessed January 4, 2024).
Hardiman, F. B. (2003). Melampaui positivisme dan modernitas: Diskursus filosofis tentang metode ilmiah dan masalah modernitas. Kanisius.
Haryono. (2019). Penegakan hukum berbasis nilai keadilan substantif (Studi putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VII/2012 tertanggal 13 Februari 2012). Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(1), April.
Hyronimus, R. (2011). Filsafat hukum. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Kompas. (2018, February 1). Gara-gara tebang pohon durian, nenek 92 tahun divonis 1 bulan penjara. Kompas. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/02/01/13232741/gara-gara-tebang-pohon-durian-nenek-92-tahun-divonis-1-bulan-penjara (Accessed January 4, 2024).
Liebmann, M. (2007). Keadilan restoratif, cara kerjanya. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2009). Putusan Nomor 247/Pid.B/2009/PN PWT. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/beranda.html (Accessed January 4, 2024).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2015). Putusan No. 39/Pid.B/2015/PN. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/3a1400717480e81f1bdc929a2e202d8b.html (Accessed January 4, 2024).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2019). Putusan Nomor 590/Pid.B/2019/PN Simalungun. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/beranda.html (Accessed January 4, 2024).
Najwan, J. (2010). Implikasi aliran positivisme terhadap pemikiran hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(3).
Prayatna, E. (2021, December). Aliran realisme hukum pada filsafat hukum. Erisamdy Prayatna. https://www.erisamdyprayatna.com/2021/12/aliran-realisme-hukum-pada-filsafat.html (Accessed January 6, 2024).
Sitabuana, T. H., & Adhari, A. (2020). Positivisme dan implikasinya terhadap ilmu dan penegakan hukum oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa putusan nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016). Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(1), March.
