Pengaruh Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Upaya Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

Authors

  • Efraim Abigail Bukit Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Fauzan Fauzan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.1736

Keywords:

Legislative Policy, Legal Reform, Politics, Corruption

Abstract

Corruption is a multidimensional challenge that hampers economic, social and political development in Indonesia. Legislative policy plays a key role in efforts to overcome criminal acts of corruption, by providing a legal framework that becomes the basis for law enforcement. This research aims to analyze the influence of legislative policies in tackling criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, evaluate obstacles in their implementation, and identify strategies to increase their effectiveness. This research uses a qualitative approach with a literature review method, examining various legal documents, reports from related institutions, and academic literature. The research results show that legislative policies, such as Law no. 31 of 1999 jo. Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, played a significant role in establishing anti-corruption institutions, such as the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), and provided a strong legal basis for law enforcement. However, the effectiveness of this policy faces obstacles in the form of systemic corruption, political resistance, weak inter-institutional coordination, and policy revisions that weaken the independence of anti-corruption institutions. This research also found that transparency in the legislative process, strengthening the monitoring system, and increasing community participation are strategic steps to support anti-corruption policies. This research concludes that the success of legislative policies in eradicating corruption depends on strong political commitment, the integrity of law enforcement, and active community participation. By overcoming existing obstacles, legislative policies can become a more effective instrument in realizing clean and transparent governance.

References

Fitriana, L. (2023). Peran pendidikan dalam peningkatan kesadaran masyarakat terhadap korupsi. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 7(1), 25–38.

Fitriani, A. (2021). Integritas legislator sebagai faktor kunci dalam pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Kebijakan, 9(4), 88–102.

Fitriani, R. (2021). Pendidikan antikorupsi sebagai strategi pencegahan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebijakan Publik, 10(2), 123–135.

Kurniawan, A. (2022). Konflik kepentingan dalam kebijakan legislasi di Indonesia: Analisis terhadap kasus korupsi. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 14(1), 45–60.

Kurniawan, T. (2023). Independensi lembaga penegak hukum dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Sosial, 12(2), 55–70.

Rahmawati, F. (2023). Transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam kebijakan legislasi antikorupsi. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(2), 123–136.

Rahmawati, N. (2023). Efektivitas sanksi dalam undang-undang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Tata Negara, 19(3), 89–102.

Saragih, Y. M., & Ariansyah, A. (2022). Kebijakan pedoman pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 8(1), 114–120.

Suharto, D. (2022). Dampak revisi undang-undang KPK terhadap kinerja pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Studi Kebijakan Publik, 8(4), 150–167.

Susilo, B. (2022). Reformasi kelembagaan dalam sistem antikorupsi di Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Publik, 15(3), 112–128.

Susilo, H. (2021). Koordinasi antarlembaga penegak hukum dalam penanganan kasus korupsi. Jurnal Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 13(2), 70–85.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-21

How to Cite

Efraim Abigail Bukit, Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih, & Fauzan Fauzan. (2025). Pengaruh Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Upaya Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 3(1), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.1736

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.