Hukuman Pidana Mati dalam KUHP Baru dan Perspektif Abolisionalis serta Retensionis

Authors

  • Dita Melati Putri UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1451

Keywords:

Death penalty, abolitionist, New Criminal Code

Abstract

In Law Number 1 of 2023 or the New Criminal Code, the death penalty is regulated as an extreme punishment for serious crimes with a stricter approach. Article 67 of the New Criminal Code states that the death penalty is no longer the main punishment, but the last alternative after a ten-year probation period. This study uses a normative method with two categories of legal sources: primary legal materials, namely laws that regulate the death penalty, and secondary legal materials, which explain and interpret primary laws. The debate on the death penalty involves two main currents of thought: retensionists, who favor the application to serious crimes, and abolitionists, who reject it because of human rights concerns and the risk of judicial wrongdoing. Criticism of the death penalty includes the issue of the right to life and its effectiveness in reducing crime rates, especially in corruption and narcotics cases. In this study, it was found that the New Criminal Code tries to balance the retributive and rehabilitative aspects by providing an opportunity for remorse before the application of the penalty, describing Indonesia's legal efforts to maintain the death penalty with a more selective and strict application.

References

Anjari, Warih. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Widya Yustisia 1, no. 2 (2010): 494 hlm.

Dewi, Ni Komang Ratih Kumala. “KEBERADAAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP).” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 6, no. 1 (2020): 104–114.

Dotulong, Jeaniffer Rachel Gabriella, Olga A. Pangkerego, and Roy V. Karamoy. “Fungsi Dan Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia.” Lex Administratum 10, no. 3 (2022): 1–13.

Kumalasari, Rosa. “KEBIJAKAN PIDANA MATI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM.” Jurnal Untidar 2, no. 1 (2018): 1–14.

Maya, Genoveva A K S. “Laporan Situasi Kebijakan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia : Tak Ada Yang Terlindungi.” Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (2023): 32.

Sipayung, Baren, Sardjana Orba Manullang, and Henry Kristian Siburian. “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 1 (2023): 141.

Wijaya, Rizky Ramadhan Adi, and Mitro Subroto. “Analisis Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Di Tinjau Dari Prespektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Rio Law Jurnal 2, no. 4 (2021): 33–42.

Topo Santoso, Menyoal Hukuman Mati. https://law.ui.ac.id/topo-santoso-media-indonesia-menyoal-hukuman-mati/ (Diakses pada 17 Agustus 2024)

Downloads

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Dita Melati Putri. (2024). Hukuman Pidana Mati dalam KUHP Baru dan Perspektif Abolisionalis serta Retensionis. Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1451

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.