Evaluasi Kebijakan Transportasi Massal Kota Surabaya: Dampak Kegagalan Sterilisasi Jalur Prioritas terhadap Kinerja Waktu Tunggu Suroboyo Bus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/srj-yappi.v4i3.2467Keywords:
Mixed Traffic, Policy Evaluation, Priority Lane, Suroboyo Bus, William N. DunnAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Suroboyo Bus priority lane sterilization policy in Corridor R1/R2 of Surabaya City. The existence of this mass transportation is expected to unravel urban traffic congestion, but operational reality on the ground shows a significant deviation in waiting times. The approach used is a descriptive qualitative research utilizing the public policy evaluation criteria from William N. Dunn, which includes effectiveness, adequacy, and responsiveness. Primary and secondary data collection was conducted through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies. The research results prove that the policy implementation has not been effective because the fleet waiting time reaches 32 minutes, which exceeds the 15-minute service standard due to the loss of road space autonomy in mixed traffic. The adequacy level of the instrument is considered very weak because visual paint markings have failed to create a psychological deterrent effect without being balanced by the construction of physical barriers and law enforcement. This structural failure impacts the low responsiveness of services, which then triggers a crisis of trust and a shift in commuter behavior towards ride-hailing services. The researcher recommends tactical interventions in the form of integrated law enforcement, the installation of concrete physical separators, and the adoption of transit signal priority technology at intersections.
References
Advani, M. (2021). Direction change dan sterilisasi jalur busway sebagai solusi alternatif mengurangi angka kecelakaan dan menertibkan lalu lintas. Jurnal Keselamatan Transportasi, 9(1), 45–60.
Dinas Perhubungan Kota Surabaya. (2024). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LKjIP) Dinas Perhubungan Kota Surabaya Tahun 2023.
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). Routledge.
Hafizh, R. L., & Wahyudi, A. (2021). Efektivitas Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) sebagai metode pembayaran nontunai Suroboyo Bus. Jurnal Ekonomi, Hukum, Dan Sains Sosial (JEHSS), 1(2), 15–28.
Irjayanti, A. D., Sari, D. W., & Rosida, I. (2021). Perilaku pemilihan moda transportasi pekerja komuter: Studi kasus Jabodetabek. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 21(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.2021.09
Kurniawan, A. A. (2018). Implementasi Suroboyo Bus di Dinas Perhubungan Kota Surabaya. Publika, 6(9), 1–12.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Oktaviani, E. (2023). Kualitas pelayanan transportasi perkotaan dalam meningkatkan kepuasan masyarakat di Surabaya (Studi kasus pada angkutan Suroboyo Bus).
Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2021). Peraturan Walikota Surabaya Nomor 81 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Massal.
Putri, N. A., & Prabawati, I. (2020). Evaluasi pelaksanaan Suroboyo Bus di Dinas Perhubungan Kota Surabaya. Publika, 8(3), 1–9.
Rizal, Y. A. H., Ari, I. R. D., & Waloejo, B. S. (2023). Evaluasi kinerja operasional dan kinerja pelayanan Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Trans Mebidang. Planning for Urban Region and Environment Journal (PURE), 12(4), 109–120. https://purejournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/pure/article/view/628
Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Penerbit ITB.
Vuchic, V. R. (2007). Urban Transit: Operations, Planning, and Economics. John Wiley & Sons.
World Bank. (2022). Urban Transport and Climate Change.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Student Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






