Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Komunikasi Dan Informatika Kabupaten Bima

Authors

  • Ansyar Ansyar Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bima
  • Firmansyah Kusumayadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/profit.v2i4.1370

Keywords:

Organizational Climate, Employee Work Productivity

Abstract

This research aims to determine the influence of Organizational Climate on the Work Productivity of Bima Regency Communication and Information Service Employees. This research is of associative type. The population used was all service employees as many as 61 respondents using purposive sampling techniques to obtain a sample of 40 respondents. The research instrument used is a Likert scale questionnaire with data analysis techniques, validity test, reliability test, simple regression analysis, simple correlation analysis, determination test and T test. The results of this research conclude that there is a significant influence between organizational climate on employee work productivity in Bima Regency Communication and Information Service with a calculated t value of 15.791 which is greater than the t table of 2.026. The determination test shows that employee work productivity is influenced by organizational climate by 86.8%, while the remaining 13.2% is influenced by other factors or variables not included in this research.

References

A.A Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ariani, D., Saputri, I. P., & Suhendar, I. A. (2020). Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja, Iklim Organisasi Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Guru. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 1(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v1i3.110

Adib Zaenal Fanani, Matin, N. (2018). Pengaruh iklim organisasi dan desain kerja terhadap produktivitas pegawai Dinas Pendidikan Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 74–83.

Diurna, A. Pangumpia (2014). Pengaruh Iklim Komunikasi Organisasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Di Bank Prisma Dana Manado Fadly. Journal “Acta Diurna,” II(2), 10. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/90665-ID-pengaruh-iklim-komunikasi-organisasi-ter.pdf

Hastuti, D. N., Dewi, L., & Suhardini, D. (2017). The Influence of Organizational Climate on Work Productivity Library Staff at CISRAL Padjadjaran University. Edulib, 6(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.17509/edulib.v6i1.4999

Kamuli, S. (2012). Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai di Sekretariat Daerah Kota Gorontalo. Jurnal Inovasi, 9 (1), 1–8.

Karyana, A. (2012). Pelaksana Teknis Kurikulum Kecamatan Jasinga Kabupaten. Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen, 8, 67–83.

Lina Nurliana. (2019). Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Di Kantor Kepala Desa Ciharalang Kecamatan Cijeungjing Kabupaten Ciamis. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Nur Azizah, & Gunadi, T. (2020). Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Perilaku Produktif Karyawan Pada Bagian Sumber Daya Manusia di Perusahaan Daerah Kebersihan Kota Bandung. Coopetition: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v11i3.131

Pengaruh, A., & Organisasi, I. (2022). Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Di Kantor Sekretariatan Daerah (Setdakab) Kabupaten Aceh. 1(23), 78–86.

Pustaka, K., Pemikiran, K., Hipotesis, D. A. N., & Pustaka, K. (2011). Unikom_21214009_Ade_Ipan_Al_Viqri_Bab Ii. 16–38.

Romli, A. R. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Dan Produktivitas Legislasi Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 14(2), 56–64. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Ekonomika/article/view/1305

Sugiyono, (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatis R&D. Bandung alfebeta.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-27

How to Cite

Ansyar Ansyar, & Firmansyah Kusumayadi. (2023). Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Komunikasi Dan Informatika Kabupaten Bima. Profit: Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 2(4), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.58192/profit.v2i4.1370