Pengaruh Lokasi, Cita Rasa, dan Harga Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian di Sate Pak Eko Satak Kecamatan Puncu Kediri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/populer.v2i4.1399Keywords:
Location, Taste, PriceAbstract
This research explains the influence of location, taste and price on purchasing decisions at Sate Pak Eko Satak, Puncu Kediri District. The method in this research is the quantitative method and the technical analysis used is validity test, reliability test, correlation test, multiple linear regression analysis, t test (partial test), f test (simultaneous test), and R2 coefficient of determination test. The population in this study was 100 respondents. The sample collection technique in this research used incidental sampling (a technique for determining samples based on chance) and the number of samples used was 100 respondents. In this research, the results showed that location had no partial and significant influence on purchasing decisions, taste had a partial and significant influence on purchasing decisions, and price had a partial and significant influence on purchasing decisions. Furthermore, location, taste and price together have a big relationship to purchasing decisions, and location, taste and price have a simultaneous and significant influence on purchasing decisions.
References
Jamal, A., & Busman, S. A. (2021). Pengaruh Cita Rasa Dan Lokasi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Ayam Geprek Junior Cabang Pekat Di Kabupaten Sumbawa. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 4(2), 27–34.
Pramutoko Bayu, SE., M. (2014). Manajemen Pemasaran (Cetakan Ke). Dimar Intermedia.
Robby Fauji, & Syifa Pramudita Faddila. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Lokasi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Pada Johar Futsal Karawang. Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Kreatif, 5(2), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.36805/manajemen.v5i2.1029
Sugiyono. (2019). metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D (1st ed.).
Sumarsid. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Dan Harga Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Pada Grabfood (Studi Wilayah Kecamatan Setiabudi). Jurnal Ilmiah M-Progress, 12(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.35968/m-pu.v12i1.867
