Peranan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek

Authors

  • Muhammad Anwar Ibrahim Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Gema Permana Rahman Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Taufiqurrohman Syahuri Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.786

Keywords:

Trademark, Administrative Court, Banking Disputes

Abstract

As time goes by and the development of law in Indonesia, the trademark has become a symbol that has been integrated in the life of society. Given the importance of a brand, the brand must get a protection from each country. Protection of a trademark in Indonesia is regulated in Act No. 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, one of the materials regulated in the Act is about the settlement of trademark disputes. The settlement of trademark disputes is resolved by two judicial bodies, namely the Commercial Court and the State Administrative Court. This research uses a normative juridical approach method with descriptive analytical analysis of legal materials. The results of this study found that the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) is to examine, decide and resolve State Administrative disputes (TUN) in a dispute arising in the field of State Administrative law (TUN) between persons or civil law entities (members of the public) with agencies or TUN officials (government) within the scope of the central government also includes local government as a result of the issuance of a TUN decision (beschikking). State Administrative Court has a very important role in resolving trademark disputes on the basis of registered trademark owners object to the decision to remove the registered trademark on the initiative of the Minister.

 

References

BUKU

Basah, Sjachran. 1992. Menelaah Liku-Liku Rancangan Undang Undang No-tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung : Alumni.

Donandi, Sujana. 2019. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Hartono, Sunaryati. 1982. Hukum Ekonomi Pembangunan Indonesia. Bandung: Binacipta.

Indriyanto, Agung dan Irnie Mela Yusnita. 2017. Aspek Hukum Pendaftaran Merek. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Marbun, S.F. 2003. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Liberty.

Mujiburohman, Dian Aries. 2022. Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta : Penerbit STPN Press.

Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2019. Metode Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Permana, Tri Cahya Indra. 2016. Catatan Kritis Terhadap Perluasan Kewenangan Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Genta Press.

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Majmudi. 1995. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Pesada.

Sutedi, Adrian. 2009. Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

JURNAL

Sudarsono. 2018. Harmonisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Pengadilan Niaga. Jakarta : Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 7, Nomor 1, April 2018.

PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara

Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Muhammad Anwar Ibrahim, Gema Permana Rahman, & Taufiqurrohman Syahuri. (2023). Peranan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek. Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.786

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.