Tren Publikasi Ilmiah dalam Kajian Administrasi Publik: Analisis Bibliometric Data Scopus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.1652Keywords:
Public Administration, Bibliometric, VOSviewerAbstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the trend of scientific publications on Public Administration studies published in Scopus indexed journals based on 2014 to 2024. Methods: Data was obtained based on the Scopus database in October 04, 2024 at 21:30 WIB using the word “Public Administration” and found 19,743 document results that were used to search in several categories, including tittle, abstract and keywords. The author conducts content analysis using VOSviewer software version 1.6.17 which functions to visualize the interactions that occur in the research data obtained. The data collection process was carried out using analyze search in the document output. Meanwhile, data analysis is carried out based on infographic mapping of the development of research documents, mapping documents against data such as affiliation, country, subject area, type of publication which in the end sees the interaction of relationships that occur in research that studies Public Administration. Results: The study of public administration based on the 2014-2024 range conducted by several researchers continues to grow based on year to year seen in the infographic there are 19,743 published documents discussing Public Administration in various countries. The affiliation that actively conducts Public Administration studies is the research forum of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, namely 161 documents conducted & the United States is the country that ranks first for scientific publications, namely 3,151 Scopus indexed documents.
References
Bhuiyan, S., & Perry, J. L. (2024). Building global public administration knowledge: Leveraging the power of collaboration. Public Administration Review, 84(3), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13768
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2009). More quality through competitive quality awards? An impact assessment framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(3), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309337687
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2023). Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231198737
Hassan, W., & Duarte, A. E. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: A few suggestions. Current Problems in Cardiology, 49(8), 102640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102640
Hilmer Pedersen, K., & Johannsen, L. (2018). New Public Governance in the Baltic States: Flexible Administration and Rule Bending. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(3), 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1465828
Holzer, M. (2022). The Future of Public Administration. Public Integrity, 24(1), 102–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2003153
Jiang, H., Liu, F., Qin, Z., Peng, Y., Zhu, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., & Gong, L. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of the association between periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease. Heliyon, 10(11), e32065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32065
Kulal, A., Rahiman, H. U., Suvarna, H., Abhishek, N., & Dinesh, S. (2024). Enhancing public service delivery efficiency: Exploring the impact of AI. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100329
Kut, P., & Pietrucha-Urbanik, K. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods in Environmental and Energy Engineering Using CiteSpace Software: Identification of Key Research Trends and Patterns of International Cooperation. Energies, 17(16), 3941. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17163941
Lyu, P., Zhang, M., Liu, C., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2023). Global scientific production, international cooperation, and knowledge evolution of public administration. Public Administration, 101(3), 1134–1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12853
McDonald, B. D., Hall, J. L., O’Flynn, J., & van Thiel, S. (2022). The future of public administration research: An editor’s perspective. Public Administration, 100(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12829
Ni, C., Sugimoto, C. R., & Robbin, A. (2017). Examining the Evolution of the Field of Public Administration through a Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12737
Nurhadi, N., & Meilinda, S. D. (2024). BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v4i1.130
Profiroiu, C. M., Negoiță, C. I., & Costea, A. V. (2024). Digitalization of public administration in EU member states in times of crisis: the contributions of the national recovery and resilience plans. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231177554
Trondal, J. (2016). Advances to the study of international public administration. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1168982
Virtanen, P., & Jalonen, H. (2024). Public value creation mechanisms in the context of public service logic: an integrated conceptual framework. Public Management Review, 26(8), 2331–2354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2268111
Yang, K. H., & Thoo, A. C. (2022). An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database. F1000Research, 11, 864. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121838.1
