Hak Kewarganegaraan dalam Perspektif Konstitusi Indonesia : Analisis Pasal 26 UUD 1945 yang Mengatur tentang Kewarganegaraan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1586Keywords:
Citizenship, Dual Citizenship, Constitution, GlobalizationAbstract
This study explores the regulation of citizenship under Article 26 of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia and its implications in the context of globalization. Article 26 defines who qualifies as an Indonesian citizen and provides a legal basis for more detailed citizenship regulations. In light of increased global mobility and complex international relations, new challenges have emerged that necessitate a reassessment of citizenship policies, particularly regarding dual citizenship. A normative juridical methodology is utilized in this research to explore the concept of citizenship from a constitutional viewpoint and compares Indonesia’s policies with those of other countries that recognize dual citizenship. The study finds that Indonesia’s current citizenship regulations need to be updated to be more adaptable and inclusive in addressing global changes. It is suggested that the Indonesian government consider revising its citizenship laws to better safeguard the rights of Indonesian citizens abroad and enhance connections with the diaspora.
References
Abdullah. (2023). Diaspora Indonesia dan kewarganegaraan ganda. Jurnal Politik Indonesia, 18(1).
Abraham, D. (2021). Dual citizenship and globalization: A European perspective. European Law Review, 32(4).
Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia (4th ed.). Sinar Grafika.
Castles. (2020). Globalization, migration, and citizenship. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(3).
David. (2022). Citizenship and national identity in Japan. Asian Law Review, 29(1).
Hanafi. (2021). Citizenship in the era of globalization: A comparative study. Routledge.
Jones. (2022). Rethinking dual citizenship in the age of global mobility. International Journal of Law and Society, 15(2).
Kumar. (2023). India’s citizenship laws and their global implications. South Asian Studies Journal, 14(3).
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge University Press.
Nasoha, A. M. M. (2014). Analisis wewenang Polri dalam rangka penanggulangan tindak pidana terorisme di Indonesia ditinjau dari segi hak asasi manusia. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Nasoha, A. M. M. (2016). Eksistensi penerapan hukuman mati di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum, 1(1), Januari–Juni.
Nasoha, A. M. M., & Novianto, B. A. (2023). Nilai-nilai pendidikan fiqih dalam kitab Nurul Burhan karya Syaikh Muslih Bin Abdurrahman Al Maraqi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5(1).
Nasoha, A. M. M., & Saputri, A. M. W. (2022). Analisis krins perkawinan yang dilarang di Indonesia ditinjau dari fiqih perbandingan mazhab. Jurnal Bedah Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Boyolali, 6(1).
Nasoha, A. M. M., Nihayah, N. K., & Winati, A. A. (2023). Analisis kawin paksa dalam perspektif hukum Islam. El-Faqih: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Islam, 9(2), Oktober.
Putri. (2020). Tantangan perkawinan campuran dalam konteks kewarganegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Hukum, 9(4).
Rahman. (2022). Kewarganegaraan dalam perspektif hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 8(2).
Smith. (2023). Global citizenship and national sovereignty: Conflicts and compromises. Global Law Journal, 35(1).
Spiro. (2021). Global mobility and the transformation of citizenship. Harvard International Law Journal, 62(1).
Sulistiawati, L. Y. (2021). Kewarganegaraan dan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Jurnal HAM Indonesia, 12(3).
Supramono. (2020). Hukum kewarganegaraan Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights.
United Nations. (1954). Convention relating to the status of stateless persons.
UU No. 12 Tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan Republik Indonesia.
UUD 1945, Pasal 26.
Von Brechen, M. (2022). Europe’s response to dual citizenship. European Law Journal, 40(3).
